Judgment_paragraph 35 · PARKING d.o.o. and Interplastics s.r.o. v SAWAL d.o.o. and Letifico d.o.o (C-267/19, C-323/19)

35Such an interpretation of Article 3(1) of Regulation No 1896/2006 is also, in principle, used to establish the cross-border nature, and, accordingly, the international element, of a dispute for the purposes of applying Regulation No 1215/2012. Since both of those regulations come within the field of judicial cooperation in civil matters having cross-border implications, the interpretation of equivalent concepts used by the EU legislature in them should be harmonised.