Judgment_paragraph 34 · PARKING d.o.o. and Interplastics s.r.o. v SAWAL d.o.o. and Letifico d.o.o (C-267/19, C-323/19)

34On the basis of that provision, the Court has held that, since the applicant in an order for payment procedure has its registered office in a Member State other than that in which the court is situated, the dispute is cross-border in nature and therefore comes within the scope of Regulation No 1896/2006 (see, to that effect, judgment of 19 December 2019, Bondora, C‑453/18 and C‑494/18, EU:C:2019:1118, paragraph 35).