Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
YS v NK (C-223/19)
Consideration of the questions referred
The second part of the first question
60

YS v NK (C-223/19)

law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-223-19/para_60@2026-11-12

History · 1 version

24 Sept 2020Reading

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-223/19 · ECLI:EU:C:2020:753
Decided: 24 Sept 2020
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Landesgericht Wiener Neustadt (Wiener Neustadt Regional Court, Austria)
Applicant: YS
Defendant: NK AG
Rapporteur: F. Biltgen
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 5 judges
A. Prechal, L.S. Rossi, J. Malenovský, F. Biltgen, N. Wahl
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0223

Topics

Charter of Fundamental Rights Principles of Union law Social policy

Connections

Interprets 3: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation; Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast)
Cited by 11: CJ v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) (C-389/20); Skeyes v Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd (C-353/20); Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab Afdeling Schackenborgvænge and Others v MV and Others (C-417/23); UV and XXX v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) (C-623/23); BF v Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB) (C-52/22); IG v Varhoven administrativen sad (C-289/21); KM v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) (C-625/20); EB and Others v Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB) (C-405/20); F.C.I. v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) (C-244/20); Slovak Telekom a.s. v Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (C-857/19); Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) v BT (C-843/19)2 provisions
Cites 19: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)7 provisions; E.B. v Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter BVA (C-258/17); Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation; Sky Österreich GmbH v Österreichischer Rundfunk (C-283/11); European Commission v Hungary (C-235/17); Pillbox 38 (UK) Limited, trading as Totally Wicked v Secretary of State for Health (C-477/14); Maurice Leone and Blandine Leone v Garde des Sceaux, ministre de la Justice and Caisse nationale de retraite des agents des collectivités locales (C-173/13); Mario Vital Pérez v Ayuntamiento de Oviedo (C-416/13); Víctor Manuel Julian Hernández and Others v Reino de España (Subdelegación del Gobierno de España en Alicante) and Others (C-198/13); Ursula Voß v Land Berlin (C-300/06); Isabel Elbal Moreno v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) (C-385/11); Eugenia Florescu and Others v Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Sibiu and Others (C-258/14); Tomás Horgan and Claire Keegan v Minister for Education & Skills and Others (C-154/18); Deutsche Lufthansa AG v Land Berlin (C-379/18); Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast); Carlos Escribano Vindel v Ministerio de Justicia (C-49/18); European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-192/18); Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security

Judgment of 24 Sept 2020

60In that regard, the Court has previously held that budgetary considerations cannot justify discrimination against one of the sexes (judgment of 23 October 2003, Schönheit and Becker, C‑4/02 and C‑5/02, EU:C:2003:583, paragraph 85 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.