Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Freistaat Bayern and Others (C-167/19 P)
The appeals
The fourth ground of appeal, alleging…
Findings of the Court
108

European Commission v Freistaat Bayern and Others (C-167/19 P)

law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-167-19/para_108@2026-11-13

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-167/19 P · ECLI:EU:C:2022:176
Decided: 10 Mar 2022
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: European Commission
Defendant: Freistaat Bayern
Rapporteur: N. Piçarra
Advocate General: E. Tanchev
Bench: 3 judges
K. Jürimäe, S. Rodin, N. Piçarra
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0167

Topics

History · 1 version

10 Mar 2022Reading

108However, it is settled case-law that pleas directed against grounds of the judgment included for the sake of completeness cannot as such lead to the annulment of that judgment and are therefore ineffective (see, inter alia, judgments of 28 June 2005, Dansk Rørindustri and Others v Commission, C‑189/02 P, C‑202/02 P, C‑205/02 P to C‑208/02 P and C‑213/02 P, EU:C:2005:408, paragraph 148, and of 26 March 2019, Commission v Italy, C‑621/16 P, EU:C:2019:251, paragraph 61).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Judgment of 10 Mar 2022

Connections

Cited by 9: Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-489/21); Cellnex Telecom, SA and Retevisión I, SA v European Commission (T-715/21); TenneT TSO GmbH and TenneT TSO BV v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-482/21); Koiviston Auto Helsinki Oy v European Commission (C-697/22 P); IFIC Holding AG v European Commission (T-8/21); Brunswick Bowling Products LLC v European Commission (C-694/21); Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy v European Commission (T-603/19); Helsingin kaupunki v European Commission (T-597/19); Christoph Klein v European Commission (C-430/20 P)2 provisions
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Société Régie Networks v Direction de contrôle fiscal Rhône-Alpes Bourgogne (C-333/07); Fintan Duff, Liam Finlay, Thomas Julian, James Lyons, Catherine Moloney, Michael McCarthy, Patrick McCarthy, James O'Regan, Patrick O'Donovan v Minister for Agriculture and Food and Attorney General (C-63/93); European Commission v Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo sp. z o.o (C-56/18 P); Copebi SCA v Etablissement national des produits de l'agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer) (C-505/18); Alcoa Trasformazioni Srl v European Commission (C-194/09 P); European Commission v Hansestadt Lübeck (C-524/14 P); Commission of the European Communities v Freistaat Sachsen (C-334/07); Association Vent De Colère! Fédération nationale and Others v Ministre de l’Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement and Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie (C-262/12); Ferriere Nord SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-49/05); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P)2 provisions; European Commission v Italian Republic (C-621/16 P)2 provisions; Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95 P); France Télécom SA v European Commission (C-81/10 P); Kingdom of Sweden v Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) and European Commission, Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) v European Commission and European Commission v Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) (C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P, C-532/07 P); Ziegler SA v European Commission (C-439/11 P); Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty; Slovak Republic and Hungary v Council of the European Union (C-643/15, C-647/15); Achemos Grupė UAB and Achema AB v European Commission (C-847/19); European Commission v French Republic and Orange (C-486/15 P)