Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Union Satellite Centre v KF (C-14/19 P)
The appeal
The first and second grounds of appeal
Findings of the Court
74

European Union Satellite Centre v KF (C-14/19 P)

Judgment of 25 Jun 2020law://eu/cjeu/2019/c-14-19/para_74@2026-11-11

74While it is true that the contested decisions concern the internal organisation of SatCen, the fact remains that those decisions are addressed to KF, within the meaning of the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU, and adversely affect her, within the meaning of the case-law referred to in paragraphs 69, 70 and 73 above.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-14/19 P · ECLI:EU:C:2020:492
Decided: 25 Jun 2020
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen)
Defendant: KF
Rapporteur: A. Arabadjiev
Advocate General: M. Bobek
Bench: 3 judges
A. Arabadjiev, P.G. Xuereb, T. von Danwitz
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62019CJ0014

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

25 Jun 2020Reading

Connections

Cited by 18: Ryanair DAC v European Commission (C-321/21 P); XH v European Commission (C-75/24 P); Alaa Hamoudi v European Border and Coast Guard Agency (C-136/24 P); YL v Council of the European Union and European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-435/23); Lisa Ballmann v European Data Protection Board (T-183/23); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (C-588/22); Finanziaria d'investimento Fininvest SpA (Fininvest) and Others v European Central Bank (ECB) (C-512/22 P); KS and Others v Council of the European Union and Others (C-29/22 P)8 provisions; ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission (C-249/23); Ryanair DAC and Laudamotion GmbH v European Commission (C-591/21); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (C-441/21); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (C-353/21); Romagnoli Fratelli SpA v Community Plant Variety Office (T-2/23); Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission (C-440/22 P); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (C-209/21 P); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (C-210/21 P); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (C-320/21 P); Robert Stockdale v Council of the European Union and Others (T-776/20)
Cites 12: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)10 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; A. K. and Others v Sąd Najwyższy, CP v Sąd Najwyższy and DO v Sąd Najwyższy (C-585/18, C-624/18, C-625/18); Czech Republic v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-482/17); Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials); OZ v European Investment Bank (C-558/17 P); Alfamicro - Sistemas de computadores, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda. v European Commission (C-14/18 P); EU-Canada CET Agreement (Opinion 1/17); European Commission v Systran SA and Systran Luxembourg SA (C-103/11 P); H v Council of the European Union and Others (C-455/14 P); Oscar Orlando Arango Jaramillo and Others v European Investment Bank (EIB) (C-334/12 RX)