Judgment_paragraph 60 · Mylène Troszczynski v European Parliament (C-12/19 P)

60As regards the third argument, it is sufficient to note that it concerns paragraph 101 of the judgment under appeal which, as the General Court itself stated, sets out a plea included for the sake of completeness as opposed to those set out in paragraphs 99 and 100 of that judgment. First, the appellant does not challenge paragraph 99 of the judgment under appeal and, second, paragraph 100, as is apparent from paragraph 58 above, is not vitiated by any error in law. In those circumstances, that argument must be rejected as ineffective (see, to that effect, judgment of 30 May 2018, Azoulay and Others v Parliament, C‑390/17 P, EU:C:2018:347, paragraph 29).