Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Liam Campbell v European Commission (T-701/18)
Law
58

Liam Campbell v European Commission (T-701/18)

law://eu/cjeu/2018/t-701-18/para_58@2026-11-12

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

History · 1 version

28 May 2020Reading

58It follows that the wording used by the Commission in the contested decision is not sufficient to enable the documents covered by the applicant’s request for access to be identified.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Third Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-701/18 · ECLI:EU:T:2020:224
Decided: 28 May 2020
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Liam Campbell
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: G. De Baere
Bench: 5 judges
S. Papasavvas, A.M. Collins, V. Kreuschitz, G. De Baere, G. Steinfatt
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62018TJ0701

Topics

Access to documents

Judgment of 28 May 2020

Connections

Cited by 7: Huhtamaki Holding Sàrl v European Commission (T-225/24); TotalEnergies Marketing Nederland NV v European Commission (T-332/22)12 provisions; ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission (T-354/21); Agrofert, a.s. v European Parliament (T-174/21); Huhtamaki Sàrl v European Commission (T-134/20); Aeris Invest Sàrl v European Central Bank (T-827/17); AlzChem Group AG v European Commission (T-569/19)
Cites 15: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; Kingdom of Sweden v European Commission (C-562/14 P); Liga para a Protecção da Natureza (LPN) and Republic of Finland v European Commission (C-514/11 P, C-605/11 P); European Commission v EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg AG (C-365/12 P); MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH and Intervet International BV v European Medicines Agency (C-178/18 P); ClientEarth v European Commission (C-57/16 P); Chambre de commerce et d'industrie métropolitaine Bretagne-Ouest (port de Brest) v European Commission (T-39/17); Arca Capital Bohemia a.s. v European Commission (T-440/17); AlzChem AG v European Commission (C-666/17); Sea Handling SpA v European Commission (T-456/13); Council of the European Union v Access Info Europe (C-280/11 P); ClientEarth v European Commission (C-612/13 P); Daimler AG v European Commission (T-128/14); Liam Campbell v European Commission (T-312/17)