Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Bauer Radio Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-421/18)
Law
Preliminary considerations
32

Bauer Radio Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-421/18)

Judgment of 23 Sept 2020law://eu/cjeu/2018/t-421-18/para_32@2026-11-10

32Article 127 of the withdrawal agreement stipulates that, unless otherwise provided, EU law continues to be applicable in the United Kingdom during the transition period.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fourth Chamber
Case: T-421/18 · ECLI:EU:T:2020:433
Decided: 23 Sept 2020
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Bauer Radio Ltd
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Rapporteur: R. Frendo
Bench: 3 judges
S. Gervasoni, L. Madise, R. Frendo
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62018TJ0421

Topics

History · 1 version

23 Sept 2020Reading

Connections

Cited by 10: Rain Carbon Germany GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1188/23); Shopify Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-222/21)2 provisions; Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-711/20); Nowhere Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-281/21); Fashion Energy Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-699/20); Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-467/20); Nissan Motor Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-755/20); Nissan Motor Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-756/20); Indo European Foods Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-342/20); Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-463/20)
Cites 25: Regulation (EU) 2017/1001; Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (Text with EEA relevance); Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co. GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV (C-342/97); L'Oréal SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-112/03); Mory SA and Others v European Commission (C-33/14 P); Boston Scientific Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-325/06); Copernicus-Trademarks Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-684/13); Institut für Lernsysteme GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-388/00); Farmaceutisk Laboratorium Ferring A/S v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-501/12); Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International) Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-340/17); El Corte Inglés, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (Trade marks and designs) (OHIM) (T-183/02, T-184/02); Iglotex S.A. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-282/13); European Union Intellectual Property Office v Shaker di L. Laudato & C. Sas (C-334/05 P); Laboratorios RTB, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-162/01); Commercy AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-316/07); Mast-Jägermeister AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-81/03, T-82/03, T-103/03); Gérard Meric v Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-133/05); Matratzen Concord GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-6/01); Mundipharma AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-256/04); Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc., formerly Pathe Communications Corporation (C-39/97); El Corte Inglés, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-443/05); Grupo Textil Brownie, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-598/18); Bimbo SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-591/12 P); Medion AG v Thomson multimedia Sales Germany & Austria GmbH (C-120/04); Torrefazione Caffè Michele Battista Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-221/18)