Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Union Intellectual Property Office v John Mills Ltd (C-809/18 P)
The appeal
Findings of the Court
65

European Union Intellectual Property Office v John Mills Ltd (C-809/18 P)

Judgment of 11 Nov 2020law://eu/cjeu/2018/c-809-18/para_65@2026-11-10

65It follows that, so far as the interpretation of Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 is concerned, account should be taken of Article 6 septies of that convention.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-809/18 P · ECLI:EU:C:2020:902
Decided: 11 Nov 2020
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62017TJ0007
Applicant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Defendant: John Mills Ltd
Rapporteur: E. Regan
Advocate General: G. Pitruzzella
Bench: 5 judges
E. Regan, M. Ilešič, E. Juhász, C. Lycourgos, I. Jarukaitis
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62018CJ0809

Topics

History · 1 version

11 Nov 2020Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: John Mills Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-7/17)
Cited by 4: Capella EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-562/24); CEDC International sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-145/22)2 provisions; FFI Female Financial Invest GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-7/22); The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-579/19)
Cites 10: Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (Text with EEA relevance); 94/800/EC: Council Decision (of 22 December 1994) concerning the conclusion on behalf of the European Community, as regards matters within its competence, of the agreements reached in the Uruguay Round multilateral negotiations (1986-1994); A and Others v Gewestelijke stedenbouwkundige ambtenaar van het departement Ruimte Vlaanderen, afdeling Oost-Vlaanderen (C-24/19); AS v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (C-541/18); The Tea Board v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (C-673/15 P, C-674/15 P, C-675/15 P, C-676/15 P); L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC and Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika Investments Ltd and Starion International Ltd (C-487/07); Anheuser-Busch Inc. v Budĕjovický Budvar, národní podnik (C-245/02); John Mills Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-7/17); European Union Intellectual Property Office v John Mills Ltd (C-809/18); Safariland LLC v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-262/09)