Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Hungary (C-78/18)
VI.Substance
B.Articles 7, 8 and 12 of the Charter
2.The existence of limitations on the…
(b)Findings of the Court
111

European Commission v Hungary (C-78/18)

Judgment of 18 Jun 2020law://eu/cjeu/2018/c-78-18/para_111@2026-11-11

111That right corresponds to the right guaranteed in Article 11(1) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950. It must therefore be regarded as having the same meaning and scope as the latter, in accordance with Article 52(3) of the Charter.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-78/18 · ECLI:EU:C:2020:476
Decided: 18 Jun 2020
Procedure: Infringement action
Applicant: European Commission
Defendant: Hungary
Rapporteur: J. Malenovský
Advocate General: M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona
Bench: 13 judges
K. Lenaerts, R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.‑C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, E. Regan, S. Rodin, L.S. Rossi, I. Jarukaitis, E. Juhász, M. Ilešič, J. Malenovský, D. Šváby, N. Piçarra
Language: Hungarian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62018CJ0078

Topics

Charter of Fundamental Rights Free movement of capital

History · 1 version

18 Jun 2020Reading

Connections

Cited by 22: La Quadrature du Net and Others v Premier ministre and Others (C-511/18, C-512/18, C-520/18); AS 'PrivatBank' and Others v Finanšu un kapitāla tirgus komisija (C-78/21); État luxembourgeois v B and Others (C-245/19, C-246/19); European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-204/21); „ЕCOTEX BULGARIA“ LTD v Teritorialna direktsia na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (C-544/19); European Commission v Hungary (C-66/18); INTERZERO Trajnostne rešitve za svet brez odpadkov d.o.o. and Others and Surovina, družba za predelavo odpadkov d.o.o. and Others (C-254/23); UL and SA Royal Antwerp Football Club v Union royale belge des sociétés de football association ASBL (C-680/21); X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-69/21); European Superleague Company, SL v Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) and Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) (C-333/21); European Commission v Hungary (C-769/22); European Commission v Hungary (C-144/24); Kingdom of Denmark v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-19/23); European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-814/21)2 provisions; European Commission v Czech Republic (C-808/21)2 provisions; Belgian Association of Tax Lawyers and Others v Premier ministre/ Eerste Minister (C-623/22); XH v European Commission (T-613/21); Roberto Aquino v European Parliament (C-534/22); BA v Finanzamt X (C-670/21); China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and Others v European Commission (C-478/21 P); European Commission v Hungary (C-821/19); Novo Banco SA v Junta de Andalucía (C-712/19)
Cites 16: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Rechnungshof v Österreichischer Rundfunk and Others and Christa Neukomm and Joseph Lauermann v Österreichischer Rundfunk (C-465/00, C-138/01, C-139/01); Asociación Nacional de Establecimientos Financieros de Crédito (ASNEF) and Federación de Comercio Electrónico y Marketing Directo (FECEMD) v Administración del Estado (C-468/10, C-469/10); Volker und Markus Schecke GbR and Hartmut Eifert v Land Hessen (C-92/09, C-93/09); Proceedings brought by Ministerio Fiscal (C-207/16); Anonymi Geniki Etairia Tsimenton Iraklis (AGET Iraklis) v Ypourgos Ergasias, Koinonikis Asfalisis kai Koinonikis Allilengyis (C-201/15); Staat der Nederlanden v Essent NV (C‑105/12), Essent Nederland BV (C‑105/12), Eneco Holding NV (C‑106/12) and Delta NV (C‑107/12) (C-105/12, C-106/12, C-107/12); European Commission v Hungary (C-235/17); ATRAL SA v Belgian State (C-14/02); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-110/05); European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (C-546/07); SM v Entry Clearance Officer, UK Visa Section (C-129/18); Criminal proceedings against Luca Menci (C-524/15); Association Eglise de scientologie de Paris and Scientology International Reserves Trust v The Prime Minister (C-54/99)