Judgment_paragraph 65 · LSEZ SIA « Elme Messer Metalurgs » v Latvijas Investīciju un attīstības aģentūra (C-743/18)

65It follows from these considerations that, even if an economic operator, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, has failed to comply with the obligation giving it entitlement to the contribution from the Funds by reason of the insolvency or suspension of the activities of its sole business partner, that circumstance does not in itself constitute an obstacle to such a breach being regarded as an ‘irregularity’ within the meaning of Article 2(7) of Regulation No 1083/2006, in so far as a demonstration of intentional or negligent conduct on the part of the beneficiary is not necessary for the existence of such an irregularity.

LSEZ SIA « Elme Messer Metalurgs » v Latvijas Investīciju un attīstības aģentūra (C-743/18)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections