Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
UX v Governo della Repubblica italiana (C-658/18)
Consideration of the questions referred
Substance
The second question
–Directive 2003/88
85

UX v Governo della Repubblica italiana (C-658/18)

Judgment of 16 Jul 2020law://eu/cjeu/2018/c-658-18/para_85@2026-11-11

85In the present case, even though the judicial activity of magistrates is not expressly mentioned in the examples referred to in Article 2(1) of Directive 89/391, it is part of the public sector of activity. Thus, in principle, it falls within the scope of Directive 89/391 and Directive 2003/88.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-658/18 · ECLI:EU:C:2020:572
Decided: 16 Jul 2020
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Giudice di pace di Bologna (magistrate of Bologna, Italy)
Applicant: UX
Defendant: Governo della Repubblica italiana
Rapporteur: A. Arabadjiev
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 3 judges
A. Arabadjiev, P.G. Xuereb, T. von Danwitz
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62018CJ0658

Topics

Approximation of laws Charter of Fundamental Rights External action Freedom of movement for workers Non-contractual liability Principles of Union law Social policy

History · 1 version

16 Jul 2020Reading

Connections

Interprets 4: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time; Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP
Cited by 15: CJ v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) (C-389/20); Minister Sprawiedliwości v Prokurator Krajowy – Pierwszy Zastępca Prokuratora Generalnego and Rzecznik Dyscyplinarny Izby Adwokackiej w Warszawie (C-55/20); G.D. and Others v Ministero dell'Istruzione and Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) (C-270/22); Criminal proceedings against IS (C-564/19); NI v Republika Hrvatska (C-373/24)2 provisions; Ministero della Giustizia v NZ (C-253/24)2 provisions; Farmacija, d.o.o. v Občina Benedikt (C-715/23); M.M. v Presidenza del Consiglio dei ministri and Others (C-548/22)2 provisions; AV and Others v Ministero della Giustizia (C-41/23); K.L. v X sp. z o.o (C-715/20); GC and Others v Croce Rossa Italiana and Others (C-389/22); AQ and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei ministri and Others (C-40/20); PG v Ministero della Giustizia and Others (C-236/20)4 provisions; Servicio Aragonés de Salud v LB (C-942/19); CLCV and Others (Defeat device on diesel engines) (C-693/18)
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (C-621/18); A. K. and Others v Sąd Najwyższy, CP v Sąd Najwyższy and DO v Sąd Najwyższy (C-585/18, C-624/18, C-625/18); Proceedings brought by Banco de Santander SA (C-274/14); Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time; Graham J. Wilson v Ordre des avocats du barreau de Luxembourg (C-506/04); Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v Tribunal de Contas (C-64/16); CARTESIO Oktató és Szolgáltató bt (C-210/06); Petya Milkova v Izpalnitelen direktor na Agentsiata za privatizatsia i sledprivatizatsionen kontrol (C-406/15); LM (C-216/18 PPU); Alessandro Salvoni v Anna Maria Fiermonte (C-347/18); Eugenia Florescu and Others v Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Sibiu and Others (C-258/14); Union syndicale Solidaires Isère v Premier ministre and Others (C-428/09); SC Paper Consult SRL v Direcţia Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca and Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Bistriţa Năsăud (C-101/16); Carlos Escribano Vindel v Ministerio de Justicia (C-49/18); Syndicat français de l'Express international (SFEI) and others v La Poste and others (C-39/94); Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work; Domingo Sánchez Ruiz and Others v Comunidad de Madrid (Servicio Madrileño de Salud) and Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid (C-103/18, C-429/18); Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP