Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (C-621/18)

Judgment of 10 Dec 2018

law://eu/cjeu/2018/c-621-18/para_27@2026-11-12

27It follows that questions relating to EU law enjoy a presumption of relevance. The Court may refuse to rule on a question referred for a preliminary ruling by a national court only where it is quite obvious that the interpretation of EU law that is sought bears no relation to the actual facts of the main action or its purpose, where the problem is hypothetical, or where the Court does not have before it the factual or legal material necessary to give a useful answer to the questions submitted to it (judgments of 16 June 2015, Gauweiler and Others, C‑62/14, EU:C:2015:400, paragraph 25, and of 7 February 2018, American Express, C‑304/16, EU:C:2018:66, paragraph 32).

Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (C-621/18)

History · 1 version

Key facts

Connections