Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
HF v European Parliament (C-570/18 P)
The cross-appeal
Findings of the Court
30

HF v European Parliament (C-570/18 P)

Judgment of 25 Jun 2020law://eu/cjeu/2018/c-570-18/para_30@2026-11-11

30It must be recalled from the outset that it is for the Court to examine of its own motion any question relating to the admissibility of an appeal or the grounds of the appeal (see, to that effect, judgment of 28 February 2008, Neirinck v Commission, C‑17/07 P, EU:C:2008:134, paragraph 38 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-570/18 P · ECLI:EU:C:2020:490
Decided: 25 Jun 2020
Procedure: staff cases
Ruled invalid: 62017TJ0218
Applicant: HF
Defendant: European Parliament
Rapporteur: A. Kumin
Advocate General: H. Saugmandsgaard Øe
Bench: 3 judges
A. Arabadjiev, T. von Danwitz, A. Kumin
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62018CJ0570

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

25 Jun 2020Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: HF v European Parliament (T-218/17)
Cited by 21: CU v European External Action Service (T-145/24); CQ v European Economic and Social Committee (T-117/24); VP v European Parliament (T-83/23); HF v European Parliament (T-565/22); Igor Shuvalov v Council of the European Union (C-271/24 P)2 provisions; Monica Semedo v European Parliament (T-349/23); Nouryon Performance Formulations BV, formerly Nouryon Industrial Chemicals BV v European Commission (C-353/23); Marco Montanari v EUCAP Sahel Niger (T-371/22); PB v Single Resolution Board (T-789/22); PV v European Commission (T-78/21); TC v European Parliament (T-309/21); OD v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (T-61/22); Ian James Bowden and Janey Young v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (T-72/21); Kingdom of Cambodia and Cambodia Rice Federation (CRF) v European Commission (T-246/19); LU v European Investment Bank (T-536/20); HB v European Investment Bank (T-757/19); European Parliament v UZ (C-894/19 P); Belén Bernaldo de Quirós v European Commission (C-583/19 P); KN v European Economic and Social Committee (T-377/20)3 provisions; AI v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (T-65/19); Giulia Moi v European Parliament (T-17/19)2 provisions
Cites 9: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Wineke Neirinck v European Commission (C-17/07); OZ v European Investment Bank (C-558/17 P); Marie Tzirani v European Commission (F-46/11); Maria Concetta Cerafogli v European Central Bank (T-114/13 P); M. G. and N. R. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-383/13 PPU); Canadian Solar Emea GmbH and Others v Council of the European Union (C-236/17 P); HF v European Parliament (T-218/17); Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials)