Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
BT v Balgarska Narodna Banka (C-501/18)
Consideration of the questions referred
The second question
The validity of Recommendation EBA/REC…
83

BT v Balgarska Narodna Banka (C-501/18)

Judgment of 25 Mar 2021law://eu/cjeu/2018/c-501-18/para_83@2026-11-11

83It follows that the Court has jurisdiction to give a preliminary ruling on the validity of Recommendation EBA/REC/2014/02, by which the EBA requested the BNB and the FGVB to take the measures necessary to comply with Directive 94/19, in particular to put an end to the infringement of Article 1(3)(i) thereof.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-501/18 · ECLI:EU:C:2021:249
Decided: 25 Mar 2021
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Administrative Court of the City of Sofia, Bulgaria)
Applicant: BT
Defendant: Balgarska Narodna Banka
Rapporteur: N. Piçarra
Advocate General: M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona
Bench: 5 judges
M. Vilaras, N. Piçarra, D. Šváby, S. Rodin, K. Jürimäe
Language: Bulgarian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62018CJ0501

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

25 Mar 2021Reading

Connections

Interprets 4: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions; Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes; Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC
Cited by 13: QB v Mercedes-Benz Group AG (C-100/21); BRANDL Mezőgazdasági, Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Agrárminisztérium (C-286/25); Centre d’étude et de valorisation des algues SA (CEVA) v European Commission (C-686/23 P); Malacalza Investimenti Srl and Vittorio Malacalza v European Central Bank (T-134/21)2 provisions; Republic of Latvia v Kingdom of Sweden (C-822/21); Liberi editori e autori (LEA) v Jamendo SA (C-10/22); AR and Others v PK SA and Others (C-618/21); Eleveté Invest Group, SL and Others v European Commission and Single Resolution Board (T-523/17); Antonio Del Valle Ruíz and Others v European Commission and Single Resolution Board (T-510/17); Algebris (UK) Ltd and Anchorage Capital Group LLC v European Commission (T-570/17); Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and Stiftung für Forschung und Lehre (SFL) v Single Resolution Board (T-481/17); Regione Veneto v Plan Eco Srl (C-315/20); Fédération bancaire française (FBF) v Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution (ACPR) (C-911/19)2 provisions
Cites 14: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)8 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions; Vincenzo Manfredi v Lloyd Adriatico Assicurazioni SpA, Antonio Cannito v Fondiaria Sai SpA and Nicolò Tricarico and Pasqualina Murgolo v Assitalia SpA (C-295/04, C-296/04, C-297/04, C-298/04); A. K. and Others v Sąd Najwyższy, CP v Sąd Najwyższy and DO v Sąd Najwyższy (C-585/18, C-624/18, C-625/18); Dragoș Constantin Târșia v Statul român and Serviciul Public Comunitar Regim Permise de Conducere si Inmatriculare a Autovehiculelor (C-69/14); Nikolay Kantarev v Balgarska Narodna Banka (C-571/16); Åklagaren v Hans Åkerberg Fransson (C-617/10); Tibor Farkas v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Dél-alfödi Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága (C-564/15); Brasserie du Pêcheur SA v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and The Queen v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte: Factortame Ltd and others (C-46/93, C-48/93); M and Others v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides (C-391/16, C-77/17, C-78/17); Tadej Kotnik and Others v Državni zbor Republike Slovenije (C-526/14); LBI hf v Kepler Capital Markets SA and Frédéric Giraux (C-85/12)