59In the present case, as is apparent from paragraph 50 of the judgment under appeal, the Member States, which were responsible for implementing the regulation at issue, had no discretion as regards the rate of anti-dumping duty set by that regulation and the imposition of that rate on the goods concerned. Thus, the General Court was fully entitled to find that the second criterion was met.
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.