Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Tibor-Trans Fuvarozó és Kereskedelmi Kft. v DAF TRUCKS N.V (C-451/18)
Consideration of the question referred
32

Tibor-Trans Fuvarozó és Kereskedelmi Kft. v DAF TRUCKS N.V (C-451/18)

Judgment of 29 Jul 2019law://eu/cjeu/2018/c-451-18/para_32@2026-11-10

32As regards the place where such damage occurred, it is apparent from the decision at issue that the infringement established in Article 101 TFEU extended to the whole of the EEA. It thus entailed a distortion of competition in that market of which Hungary is also a member since 1 May 2004.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Sixth Chamber
Case: C-451/18 · ECLI:EU:C:2019:635
Decided: 29 Jul 2019
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Győri Ítélőtábla (Győr Regional Court of Appeal, Hungary)
Applicant: Tibor-Trans Fuvarozó és Kereskedelmi Kft.
Defendant: DAF Trucks NV
Rapporteur: C. Toader
Advocate General: M. Szpunar
Bench: 3 judges
C. Toader, A. Rosas, M. Safjan
Language: Hungarian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62018CJ0451

Topics

Judicial cooperation in civil matters

History · 1 version

29 Jul 2019Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Regulation (EU) No 1215/20122 provisions
Cited by 10: Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Volkswagen AG (C-343/19); Sumal, S.L. v Mercedes Benz Trucks España, S.L (C-882/19); RH v AB Volvo and Others (C-30/20)2 provisions; Supreme Site Services GmbH and Others v Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (C-186/19); ROI Land Investments Ltd. v FD (C-604/20); Wikingerhof GmbH & Co. KG v Booking.com BV (C-59/19); MA v FCA Italy SpA and FPT Industrial SpA (C-81/23); MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt. v Mercedes-Benz Group AG (C-425/22); Adriano Guaitoli and Others v easyJet Airline Co. Ltd (C-213/18); AU v Reliantco Investments LTD and Reliantco Investments LTD Limassol Sucursala Bucureşti (C-500/18)
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012; Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters; Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 (Rome II); Harald Kolassa v Barclays Bank plc (C-375/13); Cartel Damage Claims (CDC) Hydrogen Peroxide SA v Evonik Degussa GmbH and Others (C-352/13); AB ‘flyLAL-Lithunian Airlines’ v Starptautiskā lidosta ‘Rīga’ VAS and ‘Air Baltic Corporation’ AS (C-27/17); Universal Music International Holding BV v Michael Tétreault Schilling and Others (C-12/15); BUAK Bauarbeiter-Urlaubs- u. Abfertigungskasse v Gradbeništvo Korana d.o.o (C-579/17); Hellenische Republik v Leo Kuhn (C-308/17); Éva Nothartová v Sámson József Boldizsár (C-306/17); Dumez France SA and Tracoba SARL v Hessische Landesbank and others (C-220/88); flyLAL-Lithuanian Airlines AS v Starptautiskā lidosta Rīga VAS and Air Baltic Corporation AS (C-302/13)