Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v J. and Others (C-341/18)
Consideration of the question referred
58

Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v J. and Others (C-341/18)

Judgment of 5 Feb 2020law://eu/cjeu/2018/c-341-18/para_58@2026-11-10

58As is apparent from Article 6(1) of that code, third-country nationals may only stay on the territory of the Schengen area for a maximum period of 90 days in any 180-day period, which means that the 180-day period preceding each day of stay is examined.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-341/18 · ECLI:EU:C:2020:76
Decided: 5 Feb 2020
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Raad van State (Council of State, Netherlands)
Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid
Defendant: J. and Others
Intervener: C. and H. and Others
Rapporteur: E. Regan
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 5 judges
E. Regan, I. Jarukaitis, E. Juhász, M. Ilešič, C. Lycourgos
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62018CJ0341

Topics

Border checks Immigration policy

History · 1 version

5 Feb 2020Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (codification)
Cited by 7: NW v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark (C-368/20); Criminal proceedings against ZZ (C-246/24); SIA 'Baltijas Starptautiskā Akadēmija' and SIA 'Stockholm School of Economics in Riga' v Latvijas Zinātnes padome (C-164/21); M.P. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos (C-634/24)2 provisions; Association Avocats pour la défense des droits des étrangers (ADDE) and Others v Ministre de l'Intérieur (C-143/22); NMI Technologietransfer GmbH v EuroNorm GmbH (C-516/19); CT v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Caraş-Severin – Serviciul Inspecţie Persoane Fizice and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Timişoara – Serviciul Soluţionare Contestaţii 1 (C-716/18)
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck (C-516/17); António Fernando Maio Marques da Rosa v Varzim Sol – Turismo, Jogo e Animação, SA (C-306/16); Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing a Community Code on Visas (Visa Code); Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (codification); Association nationale d’assistance aux frontières pour les étrangers (ANAFE) v Ministre de l’Intérieur, de l’Outre-mer, des Collectivités territoriales et de l’immigration (C-606/10); X v Belgische Staat (C-302/18); Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-104/18 P); Lu Zheng v Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (C-190/17); Oussama El Dakkak and Intercontinental SARL v Administration des douanes et droits indirects (C-17/16); Air Baltic Corporation AS v Valsts robežsardze (C-575/12); Proceedings brought by Khadija Jafari and Zainab Jafari (C-646/16)