Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
The Vianel Group LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-724/17)

The Vianel Group LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-724/17)

Text not heldlaw://eu/cjeu/2017/t-724-17@2026-11-10

GlobalLawDB does not hold this law's text yet

It is listed because other laws cite it or it appears in the official index. Its details are below.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Seventh Chamber
Case: T-724/17 · ECLI:EU:T:2018:825
Decided: 22 Nov 2018
Procedure: Action for annulment
Rapporteur: Kornezov
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017TJ0724

Topics

Connections

Cited by 4: Medela Holding AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-97/23); Vinos de Arganza, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-239/19); IAK GmbH - Forum International v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-497/18); Stirlinx Arkadiusz Kamusiński v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-37/18)
Cites 12: Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (Text with EEA relevance); The Art Company B & S, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-593/15); Oriental Kitchen SARL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-286/02); NV Marly SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-57/06); The Polo/Lauren Company, LP v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-265/13); Alpinestars Research Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-521/13); Seven SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-176/10); Universidad Internacional de la Rioja, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-561/15); Laboratorios RTB, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-162/01); Nike International Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-137/09); Paul Reber GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-304/06); XXXLutz Marken GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-542/10)