411It must be observed that, even if the applicant had established that the SRB had disclosed confidential information to the press, according to settled case-law, an irregularity of that kind may lead to annulment of the decision in question only if it is established that, had it not been for that irregularity, the content of that decision would have been different (see judgment of 6 July 2000, Volkswagen v Commission, T‑62/98, EU:T:2000:180, paragraph 283 and the case‑law cited; judgment of 5 April 2006, Degussa v Commission, T‑279/02, EU:T:2006:103, paragraph 416; see, also, judgment of 3 March 2011, Siemens v Commission, T‑110/07, EU:T:2011:68, paragraph 402 and the case-law cited).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.