Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Chantal Hebberecht v European External Action Service (T-315/17)
Law
The claim for annulment
The third plea in law, alleging infrin…
–The second part, concerning the exten…
58

Chantal Hebberecht v European External Action Service (T-315/17)

law://eu/cjeu/2017/t-315-17/para_58@2026-11-13

Key facts

Court: General Court · First Chamber
Case: T-315/17 · ECLI:EU:T:2018:842
Decided: 27 Nov 2018
Procedure: staff cases successful
Applicant: Chantal Hebberecht
Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS)
Rapporteur: P. Nihoul
Bench: 3 judges
I. Pelikánová, P. Nihoul, J. Svenningsen
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017TJ0315

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

Connections

Cited by 5: Michael Heßler v European Commission (T-369/22); SE v European Commission (T-223/21)2 provisions; TO v European Union Agency for Asylum (T-727/21); DF and DG v European Investment Bank (T-387/19); European External Action Service v Chantal Hebberecht (C-93/19 P)2 provisions
Cites 22: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; European Parliament v Sonja Meyrl (T-699/16); Juha Tapio Silvan v European Commission (T-698/15); Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd v European Commission (C-550/07 P)2 provisions; Carina Skareby v European External Action Service (T-585/16); LP v European Police Office (T-719/15); 2010/427/EU: Council Decision of 26 July 2010 establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service; José Luis Buendía Sierra v European Commission (T-311/04); Arizona Chemical BV and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-369/03); Victor Navarro v European Commission (T-556/14); Elizabeth Afari v European Central Bank (T-11/03); European Police Office (Europol) v Andreas Kalmár (T-455/11); Johanna Gerdina Pleijte v European Commission (F-91/08); Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials); François Vainker v European Parliament (293/87); Belén Bernaldo de Quirós v European Commission (T-649/16); European Commission v Chrysanthe Moschonaki (T-476/11); PF v European Commission (T-617/16); HF v European Parliament (T-584/16); HQ v Community Plant Variety Office (T-592/16); Paola Staboli v European Commission (T-281/04); European Commission v Gerhard Birkhoff (T-377/08)

History · 1 version

27 Nov 2018Reading

Judgment of 27 Nov 2018

58In that regard, it should be borne in mind that the obligation to ensure equal treatment is a general principle of EU law, enshrined in Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (see judgment of 14 September 2010, Akzo Nobel Chemicals and Akcros Chemicals v Commission, C‑550/07 P, EU:C:2010:512, paragraph 54 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.