Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Michela Curto v European Parliament (T-275/17)
Law
First head of claim, inasmuch as it se…
First plea: manifest error of assessment
79

Michela Curto v European Parliament (T-275/17)

Judgment of 13 Jul 2018law://eu/cjeu/2017/t-275-17/para_79@2026-11-12

79As the present case involves a Member of an institution, it should be noted in addition that, in that capacity, Ms M. was admittedly not directly subject to the obligations laid down in the Staff Regulations, or, in particular, to the prohibition of psychological harassment laid down in Article 12a of those regulations.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · First Chamber
Case: T-275/17 · ECLI:EU:T:2018:479
Decided: 13 Jul 2018
Procedure: staff cases unfounded
Applicant: Michela Curto
Defendant: European Parliament
Rapporteur: J. Svenningsen
Bench: 3 judges
I. Pelikánová, P. Nihoul, J. Svenningsen
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017TJ0275

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

13 Jul 2018Reading

Connections

Cited by 25: HC v Court of Justice of the European Union (T-13/25); GW v European Commission (T-662/24); Isabel Sánchez v European Commission (T-229/24); CU v European External Action Service (T-145/24); DI v European Parliament (T-173/24); WU v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (T-295/23); VZ v European Parliament (T-223/23); CQ v European Economic and Social Committee (T-117/24); KF v European Investment Bank (T-222/24); VP v European Parliament (T-83/23); HF v European Parliament (T-565/22); Jean-Marc Colombani v European External Action Service (T-158/23); Crescenzio Rivellini v European Parliament (T-465/23); TU v European Parliament (T-793/22); PB v Single Resolution Board (T-789/22); PV v European Commission (T-89/20); PV v European Commission (T-78/21); VN v European Commission (T-322/23); QI v European Commission (T-807/21); OR and OS v European Commission (T-171/22); IR v European Commission (T-685/21); OD v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (T-61/22); Jean-Marc Colombani v European External Action Service (T-113/22); JS v Single Resolution Board (T-271/20); Sandra Paesen v European External Action Service (T-88/21)
Cites 25: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); HQ v Community Plant Variety Office (T-592/16); CQ v European Parliament (F-12/13); European Commission v Gerhard Birkhoff (T-377/08); HF v European Parliament (T-570/16); Manel Camós Grau v European Commission (T-309/03); Carmela Lo Giudice v European Commission (T-154/05); Carina Skareby v European Commission (F-42/10); HI v European Commission (F-133/15); Ralf Schräder v Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (C-38/09); CN v European Parliament (F-26/14); Jean Koutchoumoff v European Commission (224/87); Herbert Meister v European Union Intellectual Property Office (F-138/06); BQ v Court of Auditors of the European Union (T-7/14); Marie-Claude Girardot v European Commission (T-10/02); Ikea Wholesale Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise (C-351/04); Nakajima All Precision Co. Ltd v Council of the European Communities (C-69/89); Rütgers Germany GmbH and Others v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (T-94/10); CW v European Parliament (T-742/16); Roland Haas and Others v European Commission (T-3/96); Markus Brune v European Commission (F-59/14); Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials); François Vainker v European Parliament (293/87); CH v European Parliament (F-132/14); Paulette Füller-Tomlinson v European Parliament (T-390/10)