Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Asolo LTD v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-150/17)
Law
The second plea in law, alleging infri…
69

Asolo LTD v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-150/17)

Judgment of 4 Oct 2018law://eu/cjeu/2017/t-150-17/para_69@2026-11-11

69In the present case, it should be noted that the Board of Appeal was right to define the relevant public as being the Austrian public, made up, for the most part, of young people.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fifth Chamber
Case: T-150/17 · ECLI:EU:T:2018:641
Decided: 4 Oct 2018
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Asolo Ltd
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Rapporteur: D. Gratsias
Bench: 3 judges
D. Gratsias, A. Dittrich, P.G. Xuereb
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017TJ0150

Topics

History · 1 version

4 Oct 2018Reading

Connections

Cited by 6: Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-136/23); Zalina Tavitova v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-662/22); Copal Tree Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-445/21); Sociedade da Água de Monchique, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-195/20)3 provisions; FF IP Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-23/20); Asolo LTD v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-509/19)
Cites 16: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (Text with EEA relevance); Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (Codified version) (Text with EEA relevance); Osotspa Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-33/03); SFC Jardibric v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-417/12); Wesergold Getränkeindustrie GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-278/10); Alessandro La Rocca v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-755/16); BrandGroup GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-557/14); The Tea Board v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-627/13); Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-421/10); Tronios Group International BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-77/15); Mustafa Yilmaz v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-584/10); The Coca-Cola Company v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-175/06); International Gaming Projects Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-82/16); Aroa Bodegas, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-536/12); Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-296/02)