Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
ClientEarth v European Commission (T-108/17)
Law
Application for the annulment of the a…
28

ClientEarth v European Commission (T-108/17)

Judgment of 4 Apr 2019law://eu/cjeu/2017/t-108-17/para_28@2026-11-11

28In that regard, it should be noted that the system of judicial review provided for by the Treaties does not provide for the possibility, for the General Court, to annul a decision which is not the subject of a direct action for annulment based on Article 263 TFEU.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fifth Chamber
Case: T-108/17 · ECLI:EU:T:2019:215
Decided: 4 Apr 2019
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: ClientEarth
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: A. Dittrich
Bench: 3 judges
D. Gratsias, A. Dittrich, I. Ulloa Rubio
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017TJ0108

Topics

Environment Public health Registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (REACH Regulation)Research and technological development and space

History · 1 version

4 Apr 2019Reading

Connections

Cited by 10: Robin Wood - Gewaltfreie Aktionsgemeinschaft für Natur und Umwelt eV and Others v European Commission (T-575/22); Pollinis France v European Commission (T-94/23)2 provisions; Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission (T-412/22)2 provisions; ClientEarth and Collectif Nourrir v European Commission (T-399/23); Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission (T-1148/23); Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission (T-536/22); TestBioTech eV v European Commission (T-605/21); TestBioTech eV v European Commission (T-606/21); ClientEarth v European Commission (C-458/19 P)2 provisions; European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden (C-389/19 P)2 provisions
Cites 17: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Pillbox 38 (UK) Limited, trading as Totally Wicked v Secretary of State for Health (C-477/14); Confédération paysanne and Others v Premier ministre and Ministre de l’agriculture, de l’agroalimentaire et de la forêt (C-528/16); Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies; XXXLutz Marken GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-542/10); Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC; Ralf Schräder v Community Plant Variety Office (C-546/12 P); Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (Text with EEA relevance); TestBioTech eV and Others v European Commission (T-177/13); Gowan Comércio Internacional e Serviços Lda v Ministero della Salute (C-77/09); French Republic v European Commission (T-257/07); Verein zur Wahrung von Einsatz und Nutzung von Chromtrioxid und anderen Chrom-VI-verbindungen in der Oberflächentechnik eV (VECCO) and Others v European Commission (T-360/13); Commission Regulation (EU) No 143/2011 of 17 February 2011 amending Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals ( ‘REACH’ ) Text with EEA relevance; Schenker Ltd v European Commission (C-263/16); Omnis Group Srl v European Commission (T-74/11)