Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Cofemel – Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G-Star Raw CV (C-683/17)
Consideration of the questions referred
The first question
43

Cofemel – Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G-Star Raw CV (C-683/17)

Judgment of 12 Sept 2019law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-683-17/para_43@2026-11-10

43Against that background, the EU legislature opted for a system in which the protection reserved for designs and the protection ensured by copyright are not mutually exclusive.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-683/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2019:721
Decided: 12 Sept 2019
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Supreme Court, Portugal)
Applicant: Cofemel — Sociedade de Vestuário SA
Defendant: G-Star Raw CV
Rapporteur: J. Malenovský
Advocate General: M. Szpunar
Bench: 5 judges
A. Prechal, F. Biltgen, J. Malenovský, C.G. Fernlund, L.S. Rossi
Language: Portuguese
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0683

Topics

Approximation of laws Copyright and related rights Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

12 Sept 2019Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2001/29/EC2 provisions
Cited by 6: SI and Brompton Bicycle Ltd v Chedech / Get2Get (C-833/18); Kwantum Nederland BV and Kwantum België BV v Vitra Collections AG (C-227/23); Institutul de Istorie şi Teorie Literară „G. Călinescu” and Fundaţia Naţională pentru Ştiinţă şi Artă v HK and Others (C-649/23); Mio AB and Others v Galleri Mikael & Thomas Asplund Aktiebolag and USM U. Schärer Söhne AG (C-580/23)7 provisions; Deity Shoes, S.L. v Mundorama Confort, S.L. and Stay Design, S.L (C-323/24); View, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-49/19)
Cites 11: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2001/29/EC; Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs; Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening (C-5/08); Levola Hengelo BV v Smilde Foods BV (C-310/17); Directive 98/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 on the legal protection of designs; Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Dirk Renckhoff (C-161/17); Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH and Others (C-145/10); C & J Clark International Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs and Puma SE v Hauptzollamt Nürnberg (C-659/13, C-34/14); Football Dataco Ltd and Others v Yahoo! UK Ltd and Others (C-604/10); Cofemel – Sociedade de Vestuário SA v G-Star Raw CV (C-683/17)