Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and Freistaat Sachsen v European Commission (C-654/17 P)
The main appeal
The first ground of appeal
The first, second and third parts of t…
–Findings of the Court
93

Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and Freistaat Sachsen v European Commission (C-654/17 P)

Judgment of 29 Jul 2019law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-654-17/para_93@2026-11-10

93The assessment of the compatibility of a national measure under Article 107(3) TFEU requires in any event that that measure constitutes ‘State aid’ within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-654/17 P · ECLI:EU:C:2019:634
Decided: 29 Jul 2019
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: E. Regan
Advocate General: E. Tanchev
Bench: 5 judges
E. Regan, C. Lycourgos, E. Juhász, M. Ilešič, I. Jarukaitis
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0654

Topics

History · 1 version

29 Jul 2019Reading

Connections

Cited by 23: European Commission v Tempus Energy Ltd and Tempus Energy Technology Ltd (C-57/19 P); PGI Spain, SL and Others v European Commission (T-596/22); Portumo - Madeira - Montagem e Manutenção de Tubaria, SA (Zona Franca da Madeira) and Others v European Commission (T-713/22); Falke KGaA v European Commission (C-127/23); E. Breuninger GmbH & Co. v European Commission (C-124/23); Bastion Holding BV and Others v European Commission (T-102/21); Bastion Holding BV and Others v European Commission (T-513/21); Bastion Holding BV and Others v European Commission (T-289/21); Gmina Kosakowo v European Commission (T-209/15); Sun West and Others v European Commission (T-623/20); Google LLC, formerly Google Inc. and Alphabet, Inc. v European Commission (T-612/17); World Duty Free Group and Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-51/19 P); Sigma Alimentos Exterior, SL v European Commission (C-50/19 P); Axa Mediterranean Holding, SA v European Commission (C-54/19 P); Banco Santander, SA and Others v European Commission (C-53/19 P); Banco Santander, SA v European Commission (C-52/19 P); Prosegur Compañía de Seguridad, SA v European Commission (C-55/19 P); Ja zum Nürburgring eV v European Commission (C-647/19 P); European Commission v Fútbol Club Barcelona (C-362/19 P); NMI Technologietransfer GmbH v EuroNorm GmbH (C-516/19); Kerkosand spol. s r. o. v European Commission (T-745/17)3 provisions; European Central Bank v Espírito Santo Financial (Portugal), SGPS, SA (C-442/18 P); Arriva Italia Srl and Others v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (C-385/18)
Cites 12: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)12 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Eesti Pagar AS v Ettevõtluse Arendamise Sihtasutus and Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium (C-349/17); HGA Srl and Others (C‑630/11 P), Regione autonoma della Sardegna (C‑631/11 P), Timsas srl (C‑632/11 P) and Grand Hotel Abi d’Oru SpA (C‑633/11 P) v European Commission (C-630/11 P, C-631/11 P, C-632/11 P, C-633/11 P); Tadej Kotnik and Others v Državni zbor Republike Slovenije (C-526/14); Sadikou Gnandi v État belge (C-181/16); European Commission v Council of the European Union (C-687/15); Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty; Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty Text with EEA relevance; Scuola Elementare Maria Montessori Srl v European Commission, European Commission v Scuola Elementare Maria Montessori Srl and European Commission v Pietro Ferracci (C-622/16 P, C-623/16 P, C-624/16 P); Intel Corp. v European Commission (C-413/14 P); DTS Distribuidora de Televisión Digital, SA v European Commission (C-449/14 P)