Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
E. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-635/17)
Consideration of the questions referred
The first question
40

E. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-635/17)

Judgment of 13 Mar 2019law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-635-17/para_40@2026-11-10

40The Court has previously held that, where the condition stated in paragraph 37 above is satisfied, it may also have jurisdiction in situations covered by an express exclusion from the scope of EU legislation (judgment of 7 November 2018, C and A, C‑257/17, EU:C:2018:876, paragraph 37 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-635/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2019:192
Decided: 13 Mar 2019
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem (District Court, The Hague, sitting in Haarlem, Netherlands)
Applicant: E.
Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
Rapporteur: A. Arabadjiev
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 5 judges
A. Arabadjiev, T. von Danwitz, M. Berger, C. Vajda, P.G. Xuereb
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0635

Topics

Judicial cooperation in civil matters Justice and home affairs

History · 1 version

13 Mar 2019Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification
Cited by 9: DB v Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob) (C-481/19); B. M. M. and Others v État belge (C-133/19, C-136/19, C-137/19); Sagrario and Others v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Barcelona (C-63/23); X and Others v État belge (C-1/23 PPU); AS „PrivatBank” v Finanšu un kapitāla tirgus komisija (C-480/18); TB v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal (C-519/18); G.S. and V.G. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-381/18, C-382/18)2 provisions; Deutsche Post AG and Klaus Leymann v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (C-203/18, C-374/18); X v Belgische Staat (C-706/18)
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; K and B v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-380/17); Mimoun Khachab v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Álava (C-558/14); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-540/03); C and A v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-257/17)2 provisions; Jasna Detiček v Maurizio Sgueglia (C-403/09); K. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-18/16); United States of America v Christine Nolan (C-583/10); E. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-635/17); Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken v K and A (C-153/14); O and S v Maahanmuuttovirasto and Maahanmuuttovirasto v L (C-356/11, C-357/11); Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification