Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
IBA Molecular Italy Srl v Azienda ULSS n. 3 and Others (C-606/17)
Consideration of the questions referred
The first question
28

IBA Molecular Italy Srl v Azienda ULSS n. 3 and Others (C-606/17)

Judgment of 18 Oct 2018law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-606-17/para_28@2026-11-10

28It is clear from the usual legal meaning of ‘for pecuniary interest’ that those terms designate a contract by which each of the parties undertakes to provide a service in exchange for another.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Eighth Chamber
Case: C-606/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:843
Decided: 18 Oct 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State, Italy)
Applicant: IBA Molecular Italy Srl
Defendants: Azienda ULSS No 3; Regione Veneto; Ministero della Salute; Ospedale dell’Angelo di Mestre
Interveners: Istituto Sacro Cuore ‑ Don Calabria di Negrar; Azienda ULSS No 22
Rapporteur: D. Šváby
Advocate General: M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona
Bench: 3 judges
M. Vilaras, J. Malenovský, D. Šváby
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0606

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

18 Oct 2018Reading

Connections

Cited by 1: Tax-Fin-Lex d.o.o. v Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve (C-367/19)2 provisions
Cites 7: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts; Teckal Srl v Comune di Viano and Azienda Gas-Acqua Consorziale (AGAC) di Reggio Emilia (C-107/98); Stadt Halle and RPL Recyclingpark Lochau GmbH v Arbeitsgemeinschaft Thermische Restabfall- und Energieverwertungsanlage TREA Leuna (C-26/03); Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (C-480/06); Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Lecce and Università del Salento v Ordine degli Ingegneri della Provincia di Lecce and Others (C-159/11); Piepenbrock Dienstleistungen GmbH & Co. KG v Kreis Düren (C-386/11)