Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Kingdom of Belgium v European Commission (C-587/17 P)
The appeal
The second part of the single ground o…
Findings of the Court of Justice
68

Kingdom of Belgium v European Commission (C-587/17 P)

Judgment of 30 Jan 2019law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-587-17/para_68@2026-11-10

68However, those provisions do not lay down the specific measures which must be adopted for that purpose, in particular the court proceedings which must be initiated in order to recover those sums.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-587/17 P · ECLI:EU:C:2019:75
Decided: 30 Jan 2019
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62016TJ0287
Applicant: Kingdom of Belgium
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: C. Lycourgos
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 5 judges
T. von Danwitz, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos, E. Juhász, C. Vajda
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0587

Topics

Agricultural funds

History · 1 version

30 Jan 2019Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Kingdom of Belgium v European Commission (T-287/16)
Cited by 5: Portuguese Republic v European Commission (T-512/22); Hungary v European Commission (T-491/21); Republic of Bulgaria v European Commission (T-235/21)2 provisions; Republic of Lithuania v European Commission (C-153/20); Portuguese Republic v European Commission (T-292/18)
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy; Saint-Gobain Glass Deutschland GmbH v European Commission (C-60/15 P); Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008; Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities (C-54/95); European Commission v French Republic (C-416/17); Commission Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 of 21 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 as regards the accreditation of paying agencies and other bodies and the clearance of the accounts of the EAGF and of the EAFRD; Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities (C-28/89); French Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-277/98); João Filipe Ferreira da Silva e Brito and Others v Estado português (C-160/14); Vonk Dairy Products BV v Productschap Zuivel (C-279/05); Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-5/03); Council Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 of 4 March 1991 concerning irregularities and the recovery of sums wrongly paid in connection with the financing of the common agricultural policy and the organization of an information system in this field and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 283/72; French Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-118/99); Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 of 27 November 1987 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products; Kingdom of Belgium v European Commission (T-287/16); Srl CILFIT and Lanificio di Gavardo SpA v Ministry of Health (C-283/81)