Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Criminal proceedings against Daniel Adam Popławski (C-573/17)
Consideration of the questions referred
The first question
71

Criminal proceedings against Daniel Adam Popławski (C-573/17)

Judgment of 24 Jun 2019law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-573-17/para_71@2026-11-10

71Since those framework decisions do not have direct effect under the EU Treaty itself, it follows from paragraph 68 above that a court of a Member State is not required, solely on the basis of EU law, to disapply a provision of its national law which is contrary to those framework decisions.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-573/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2019:530
Decided: 24 Jun 2019
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the rechtbank Amsterdam (District Court, Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Rapporteur: C. Lycourgos
Advocate General: M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona
Bench: 11 judges
K. Lenaerts, R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.‑C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, M. Vilaras, C. Lycourgos, M. Ilešič, J. Malenovský, L. Bay Larsen, C.G. Fernlund, S. Rodin
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0573

Topics

Judicial cooperation in civil matters Judicial cooperation in criminal matters

History · 1 version

24 Jun 2019Reading

Connections

Cited by 25: FY v Profi Credit Polska S.A. w Bielsku Białej (C-582/21); ZH and KN v AxFina Hungary Zrt (C-630/23); ASG 2 Ausgleichsgesellschaft für die Sägeindustrie Nordrhein-Westfalen GmbH v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (C-253/23); Trenitalia SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (C-510/23); Caronte & Tourist SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (C-511/23); Die Länderbahn GmbH and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-582/22); Skarb Państwa - Dyrektor Okręgowego Urzędu Miar w K. v Z. sp.j (C-279/23); HJ v Crédit agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (C-350/24); MJ v AA (C-521/21); Criminal proceedings against MA (C-56/25); YH v European Central Bank (T-366/23); C.J (C-305/22); T.T. and BAJI Trans, s.r. o. v Národný inšpektorát práce (C-544/23); European Central Bank and European Commission v Francesca Corneli (C-777/22); SIA „TOODE” v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (C-653/23); Criminal proceedings against P.B. and R.S (C-646/23); John Cockerill SA v État belge (C-135/24); Rada Nadzorcza Getin Noble Bank S.A. and Others v Bankowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny (C-118/23); Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, formerly Sberbank Europe AG v European Central Bank (T-647/21); BAWAG PSK Bank für Arbeit und Wirtschaft und Österreichische Postsparkasse AG v European Central Bank (T-667/21); K.L. v X sp. z o.o (C-715/20); Proceedings brought by Sofiyski gradski sad (C-722/22); Global NRG Kereskedelmi és Tanácsadó Zrt. v Magyar Energetikai és Közmű-szabályozási Hivatal (C-277/22); RQ (C-398/22); Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (C-396/22)
Cites 24: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (C-621/18); Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften eV v Tetsuji Shimizu (C-684/16); OSA — Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně a.s (C-351/12); Stadt Wuppertal v Maria Elisabeth Bauer and Volker Willmeroth v Martina Broßonn (C-569/16, C-570/16); Association de médiation sociale v Union locale des syndicats CGT and Others (C-176/12); Maribel Dominguez v Centre informatique du Centre Ouest Atlantique and Préfet de la région Centre (C-282/10); Andrea Francovich and Danila Bonifaci and others v Italian Republic (C-6/90); Stefano Melloni v Ministerio Fiscal (C-399/11); LM (C-216/18 PPU); Winner Wetten GmbH v Bürgermeisterin der Stadt Bergheim (C-409/06); TC (C-492/18 PPU); Flaminio Costa v E.N.E.L (C-6/64); Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU (Opinion 2/13); EU-Canada CET Agreement (Opinion 1/17); Criminal proceedings against Silvio Berlusconi, Sergio Adelchi and Marcello Dell'Utri and Others (C-387/02, C-391/02, C-403/02); Cresco Investigation GmbH v Markus Achatzi (C-193/17); Volkmar Klohn v An Bord Pleanála (C-167/17); Dansk Industri (DI), acting on behalf of Ajos A/S v Estate of Karsten Eigil Rasmussen (C-441/14); Criminal proceedings against Gerrit van Vemde (C-582/15); Criminal proceedings against Ognyanov (C-554/14); ML (C-220/18 PPU)