Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
OZ v European Investment Bank (C-558/17 P)
The action before the General Court
80

OZ v European Investment Bank (C-558/17 P)

Judgment of 4 Apr 2019law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-558-17/para_80@2026-11-10

80Regarding the heads of claim for damages referred to in paragraph 60 above, it should be noted that, first, the annulment of the decision at issue constitutes sufficient compensation for any non-material harm that the appellant may have suffered in the present case.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-558/17 P · ECLI:EU:C:2019:289
Decided: 4 Apr 2019
Procedure: Appeal
Ruled invalid: 62016TJ0607
Applicant: OZ
Defendant: European Investment Bank (EIB)
Rapporteur: J. Malenovský
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 5 judges
M. Vilaras, J. Malenovský, L. Bay Larsen, M. Safjan, D. Šváby
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0558

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

4 Apr 2019Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: OZ v European Investment Bank (T-607/16)
Cited by 24: MG v European Investment Bank (C-173/22 P)2 provisions; HO v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (T-76/25); Amphora Wineries AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-556/24); VZ v European Parliament (T-223/23); VP v European Parliament (T-83/23); Monica Semedo v European Parliament (T-349/23); XH v European Commission (T-11/23); Nigar Kirimova v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-727/20 R); RS v European Investment Bank (T-624/22); SN v European Parliament (C-430/23); XH v European Commission (T-353/22); YD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (T-648/21); TC v European Parliament (T-309/21); Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union (C-708/21); European Parliament v Giulia Moi (C-246/21); PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank (T-301/19); PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank (T-275/19); QM v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (T-164/21); Kingdom of Cambodia and Cambodia Rice Federation (CRF) v European Commission (T-246/19); Ivo Van Walle v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (T-83/21); Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union (C-242/21); Ivo Van Walle v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (T-33/20); LU v European Investment Bank (T-536/20); MG v European Investment Bank (T-573/20)
Cites 13: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v Tribunal de Contas (C-64/16); M. M. v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and Others (C-277/11); Khaled Boudjlida v Préfet des Pyrénées-Atlantiques (C-249/13); Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union; Kamino International Logistics BV and Datema Hellmann Worldwide Logistics BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-129/13, C-130/13); M. G. and N. R. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-383/13 PPU); Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia and Redes de Telecomunicación Galegas Retegal, SA (Retegal) v European Commission (C-70/16 P); Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2016/1192 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 on the transfer to the General Court of jurisdiction at first instance in disputes between the European Union and its servants; Ingfried Hochbaum and Edward Rawes v European Commission (C-44/85); Portuguese Republic v European Commission (C-338/16 P); OZ v European Investment Bank (T-607/16); Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials)