Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Czech Republic v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-482/17)
The action
Second plea, alleging breach of the pr…
First part of the second plea, relatin…
–Findings of the Court
84

Czech Republic v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-482/17)

Judgment of 3 Dec 2019law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-482-17/para_84@2026-11-10

84It follows that the preparation of impact assessments is a step in the legislative process that, as a rule, must take place if a legislative initiative is liable to have such implications.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-482/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2019:1035
Decided: 3 Dec 2019
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Czech Republic
Defendants: European Parliament; Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: A. Arabadjiev
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 11 judges
K. Lenaerts, R. Silva de Lapuerta, A. Arabadjiev, A. Prechal, M. Vilaras, M. Safjan, I. Jarukaitis, T. von Danwitz, C. Toader, D. Šváby, F. Biltgen
Language: Czech
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0482

Topics

Approximation of laws Industrial policy

History · 1 version

3 Dec 2019Reading

Connections

Cited by 22: Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd and Others v Staatssecretaris van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport (C-160/20); Republic of Lithuania and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-541/20)2 provisions; Hungary v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-156/21); Across Fiduciaria SpA and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei ministri and Others (C-684/24); European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (C-524/23); Giorgio Fidenato, en son nom propre et en tant que propriétaire de l’exploitation agricole « In Trois » v Ministero dell’Agricoltura, della Sovranità Alimentare e delle Foreste (C-364/24); FE v European Parliament (T-483/24); JDS Architects ApS and Others v European Parliament (T-560/23); Evonik Operations GmbH v European Commission (T-449/22)3 provisions; BASF SE and Others v European Commission (T-453/22); Nord Stream 2 AG v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (T-526/19 R); Défense Active des Amateurs d’Armes ASBL and Others v Conseil des ministres (C-234/21); European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden (C-353/22); TIB Chemicals AG v European Commission (T-639/20); Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd v European Commission (C-259/22); Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-157/21); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (C-107/20); Ciano Trading & Services CT & S SpA and Others v European Commission (T-45/21); Krajowa Izba Gospodarcza Chłodnictwa i Klimatyzacji v European Commission (T-126/19); Enrico Falqui v European Parliament (T-695/19); Maria Alvarez y Bejarano and Others v European Commission (C-517/19 P, C-518/19 P); Giacomo Santini and Others v European Parliament (T-345/19)
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Tele2 Sverige AB v Post- och telestyrelsen and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Tom Watson and Others (C-203/15); Digital Rights Ireland Ltd v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources and Others and Kärntner Landesregierung and Others (C-293/12, C-594/12); European Commission v Hungary (C-235/17); The Queen v Secretary of State for Health, ex parte British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd and Imperial Tobacco Ltd (C-491/01); The Queen, on the application of Vodafone Ltd and Others v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (C-58/08); Albert Buhagiar and Others v Minister for Justice (C-267/16); European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-504/09 P); Slovak Republic and Hungary v Council of the European Union (C-643/15, C-647/15); Italian Republic v Council of the European Union (C-611/17); Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-358/14); Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-5/16); Federal Republic of Germany v Council of the European Union (C-399/12); Directive (EU) 2017/853 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 amending Council Directive 91/477/EEC on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons (Text with EEA relevance. ); Council Directive 91/477/EEC of 18 June 1991 on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons; European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-166/07); 2001/748/EC: Council Decision of 16 October 2001 concerning the signing on behalf of the European Community of the United Nations Protocol on the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms, their parts, components and ammunition, annexed to the Convention against transnational organised crime; Directive 2008/51/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 amending Council Directive 91/477/EEC on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons