Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Proceedings brought by "Roche Lietuva" UAB (C-413/17)
Consideration of the question referred
29

Proceedings brought by "Roche Lietuva" UAB (C-413/17)

Judgment of 25 Oct 2018law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-413-17/para_29@2026-11-10

29Moreover, it appears from that provision that the Union legislation relating to technical specifications allows broad discretion for the contracting authority in the formulation of the technical specifications of a procurement contract.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Ninth Chamber
Case: C-413/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:865
Decided: 25 Oct 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Supreme Court, Lithuania)
Rapporteur: E. Juhász
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 3 judges
K. Jürimäe, E. Juhász, C. Vajda
Language: Lithuanian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0413

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

25 Oct 2018Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC Text with EEA relevance
Cited by 4: Sof Medica S.A. v Spitalul Clinic Judeţean de Urgenţă Cluj-Napoca (C-568/24)2 provisions; DYKA Plastics NV v Fluvius System Operator CV (C-424/23)2 provisions; Nordic Info BV v Belgische Staat (C-128/22); Casino, Guichard-Perrachon and Achats Marchandises Casino SAS (AMC) v European Commission (C-690/20 P)
Cites 8: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts; Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC Text with EEA relevance; European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (C-368/10); Casertana Costruzioni Srl v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti - Provveditorato Interregionale per le opere pubbliche della Campania e del Molise and Azienda Regionale Campana per la Difesa del Suolo - A.R.CA.DI.S (C-223/16); Medisanus d.o.o. v Splošna Bolnišnica Murska Sobota (C-296/15); Confédération paysanne and Others v Premier ministre and Ministre de l’agriculture, de l’agroalimentaire et de la forêt (C-528/16); Bent Mousten Vestergaard v Spøttrup Boligselskab (C-59/00)