Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri v Fallimento Traghetti del Mediterraneo SpA (C-387/17)
Consideration of the questions referred
The second question
56

Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri v Fallimento Traghetti del Mediterraneo SpA (C-387/17)

Judgment of 23 Jan 2019law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-387-17/para_56@2026-11-12

56In fulfilling their tasks, national courts may be required to uphold claims for compensation for damage caused by the unlawful State aid to competitors of the beneficiary.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-387/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2019:51
Decided: 23 Jan 2019
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Corte suprema di cassazione (Supreme Court of Cassation, Italy)
Applicant: Presidenza dei Consiglio dei Ministri
Defendant: Fallimento Traghetti del Mediterraneo SpA
Rapporteur: A. Arabadjiev
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, A. Arabadjiev, E. Regan, C.G. Fernlund, S. Rodin
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0387

Topics

History · 1 version

23 Jan 2019Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty
Cited by 6: Casino de Spa SA and Others v État belge (SPF Finances) (C-741/22)2 provisions; RegioJet a. s. and STUDENT AGENCY k.s. v České dráhy a.s. and Others (C-700/22); Ukrselhosprom PCF LLC and Versobank AS v European Central Bank (T-351/18); Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) v European Commission (T-639/14 R); Nelson Antunes da Cunha, Lda v Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) (C-627/18); Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v Azienda Napoletana Mobilità SpA (C-659/17)
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Fallimento Traghetti del Mediterraneo SpA v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri (C-140/09); Unicredito Italiano SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate, Ufficio Genova 1 (C-148/04); Deutsche Lufthansa AG v Flughafen Frankfurt-Hahn GmbH (C-284/12); Traghetti del Mediterraneo SpA v Repubblica italiana (C-173/03); European Commission v World Duty Free Group SA and Others (C-20/15 P, C-21/15 P); Transalpine Ölleitung in Österreich GmbH and Others v Finanzlandesdirektion für Tirol and Others (C-368/04); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-298/00 P); Trapeza Eurobank Ergasias AE v Agrotiki Trapeza tis Ellados AE (ATE) and Pavlos Sidiropoulos (C-690/13); Tirrenia di Navigazione SpA and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-246/99); Tirrenia di Navigazione SpA, Caremar SpA and Others and Navigazione Libera del Golfo SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-265/04); 2001/851/EC: Commission Decision of 21 June 2001 on the State aid awarded to the Tirrenia di Navigazione shipping company by Italy (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2001) 1684); ThyssenKrupp Stainless GmbH and ThyssenKrupp Acciai speciali Terni SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-65/02 P, C-73/02 P); Alzetta Mauro and others v Commission of the European Communities (T-298/97, T-312/97, T-313/97, T-315/97, T-600/97, T-601/97, T-602/97, T-603/97, T-604/97, T-605/97, T-606/97, T-607/97, T-1/98, T-3/98, T-4/98, T-5/98, T-6/98, T-23/98); Établissement national des produits de l’agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer) v Société anonyme d’intérêt collectif agricole Unanimes (C‑671/11 and C‑672/11), Organisation de producteurs Les Cimes (C‑673/11), Société Agroprovence (C‑674/11), Regalp SA (C‑675/11) and Coopérative des producteurs d’asperges de Montcalm (COPAM) (C‑676/11) (C-671/11, C-672/11, C-673/11, C-674/11, C-675/11, C-676/11); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-400/99); Ze Fu Fleischhandel GmbH and Vion Trading GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (C-201/10, C-202/10); Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty