Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Stefano Liberato v Luminita Luisa Grigorescu (C-386/17)
Consideration of the questions referred
41

Stefano Liberato v Luminita Luisa Grigorescu (C-386/17)

Judgment of 16 Jan 2019law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-386-17/para_41@2026-11-10

41That regulation is based on judicial cooperation and mutual trust, which lead to mutual recognition of judicial decisions, the cornerstone for the creation of a genuine judicial area (judgment of 15 February 2017, W and V, C‑499/15, EU:C:2017:118, paragraph 50 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-386/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2019:24
Decided: 16 Jan 2019
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Corte suprema di cassazione (Supreme Court of Cassation, Italy)
Applicant: Stefano Liberato
Defendant: Luminita Luisa Grigorescu
Rapporteur: C.G. Fernlund
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, E. Regan, C.G. Fernlund
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0386

Topics

Judicial cooperation in civil matters

History · 1 version

16 Jan 2019Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters; Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000
Cited by 2: Charles Taylor Adjusting Limited and FD v Starlight Shipping Company and Overseas Marine Enterprises INC (C-590/21); Senatsverwaltung für Inneres und Sport, Standesamtsaufsicht v TB (C-646/20)2 provisions
Cites 11: Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters; Diageo Brands BV v Simiramida-04 EOOD (C-681/13); Cartier parfums — lunettes SAS and Axa Corporate Solutions assurances SA v Ziegler France SA and Others (C-1/13); W and V v X (C-499/15)2 provisions; L v M (C-656/13); Bianca Purrucker v Guillermo Vallés Pérez (C-256/09); Bianca Purrucker v Guillermo Vallés Pérez (C-296/10); A v B (C-489/14); Stefano Liberato v Luminita Luisa Grigorescu (C-386/17); P v Q (C-455/15 PPU); Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000