Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
K and B v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-380/17)
Consideration of the questions referred
The first question
33

K and B v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-380/17)

Judgment of 7 Nov 2018law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-380-17/para_33@2026-11-11

33It follows from the foregoing that Directive 2003/86 must be interpreted as not applying to third country national family members of a beneficiary of subsidiary protection, such as the applicants in the main proceedings.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-380/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:877
Decided: 7 Nov 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Raad van State (Council of State, Netherlands)
Applicants: K; B
Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
Rapporteur: L. Bay Larsen
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 5 judges
M. Vilaras, J. Malenovský, L. Bay Larsen, M. Safjan, D. Šváby
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0380

Topics

Immigration policy Justice and home affairs

History · 1 version

7 Nov 2018Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification
Cited by 7: Cafpi SA and Aviva assurances SA v Enedis SA (C-691/21); E. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-635/17)2 provisions; AK v RU (C-197/24); CR and Others v Landeshauptmann von Wien (C-560/20); TB v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal (C-519/18)2 provisions; G.S. and V.G. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-381/18, C-382/18); Deutsche Post AG and Klaus Leymann v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (C-203/18, C-374/18)
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Fernand Ullens de Schooten v État belge (C-268/15); Online Games Handels GmbH and Others v Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich (C-685/15); Teresa Cicala v Regione Siciliana (C-482/10); Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted; Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken v K and A (C-153/14); A. Leur-Bloem v Inspecteur der Belastingdienst/Ondernemingen Amsterdam 2 (C-28/95); INEOS Köln GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-572/16); Marc Jacob and Ministre des Finances et des Comptes publics v Ministre des Finances et des Comptes publics and Marc Lassus (C-327/16, C-421/16); United States of America v Christine Nolan (C-583/10); Giuseppa Romeo v Regione Siciliana (C-313/12); Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (recast); Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification