Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Shajin Ahmed v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal (C-369/17)
Consideration of the question referred
39

Shajin Ahmed v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal (C-369/17)

Judgment of 13 Sept 2018law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-369-17/para_39@2026-11-11

39As is apparent from recitals 6 and 33 of Directive 2011/95, subsidiary protection is intended to be complementary and additional to the protection of refugees enshrined in the Geneva Convention (judgment of 1 March 2016, Alo and Osso, C‑443/14 and C‑444/14, EU:C:2016:127, paragraph 31).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-369/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:713
Decided: 13 Sept 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Budapest Administrative and Labour Court, Hungary)
Applicant: Shajin Ahmed
Defendant: Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal
Rapporteur: A. Rosas
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 5 judges
M. Ilešič, A. Rosas, C. Toader, A. Prechal, E. Jarašiūnas
Language: Hungarian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0369

Topics

History · 1 version

13 Sept 2018Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (recast)
Cited by 11: K.L. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos (C-63/24)2 provisions; QY v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-753/22); European Commission v Republic of Poland and Others (C-715/17, C-718/17, C-719/17)3 provisions; M and Others v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides (C-391/16, C-77/17, C-78/17); AA and Others v Migrationsverket (C-195/25); Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl v JF (C-222/22); XXX v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides (C-8/22); Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v M.A (C-402/22)3 provisions; GM v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság and Others (C-159/21); Mohammed Bilali v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl (C-720/17); Thun SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-604/17)
Cites 10: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); H.N. v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and Others (C-604/12); JZ v Prokuratura Rejonowa Łódź - Śródmieście (C-294/16 PPU); Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted (recast); Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted; Bundesrepublik Deutschland v B and D (C-57/09, C-101/09); Kreis Warendorf v Ibrahim Alo and Amira Osso v and Region Hannover (C-443/14, C-444/14)2 provisions; A and S v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-550/16); Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides v Mostafa Lounani (C-573/14); Criminal proceedings against Mossa Ouhrami (C-225/16)