Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Fremoluc NV v Agentschap voor Grond- en Woonbeleid voor Vlaams-Brabant (Vlabinvest ABP) and Others (C-343/17)
Admissibility of the request for a pre…
33

Fremoluc NV v Agentschap voor Grond- en Woonbeleid voor Vlaams-Brabant (Vlabinvest ABP) and Others (C-343/17)

Judgment of 20 Sept 2018law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-343-17/para_33@2026-11-10

33In the light of all the foregoing considerations, it must be held that this request for a preliminary ruling is inadmissible.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-343/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:754
Decided: 20 Sept 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel (Dutch-language Court of First Instance, Brussels, Belgium)
Applicant: Fremoluc NV
Defendants: Agentschap voor Grond- en Woonbeleid voor Vlaams-Brabant (Vlabinvest APB); Vlaams Financieringsfonds voor Grond- en Woonbeleid voor Vlaams-Brabant (Vlaams Financieringsfonds); Vlaamse Maatschappij voor Sociaal Wonen NV (VMSW); Christof De Knop and Others
Intervener: Vlaams Gewest
Rapporteur: T. von Danwitz
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 5 judges
T. von Danwitz, C. Vajda, E. Juhász, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0343

Topics

Citizenship of the Union Freedom of establishment Freedom of movement for workers Freedom to provide services Principles of Union law

History · 1 version

20 Sept 2018Reading

Connections

Cited by 7: Thelen Technopark Berlin GmbH v MN (C-261/20)2 provisions; I.G.I. Srl v Maria Grazia Cicenia and Others (C-394/18); IN and JM v Belgische Staat (C-469/18, C-470/18); Ente Cambiano società cooperativa per azioni v Agenzia delle Entrate (C-660/22); Bursa Română de Mărfuri SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Reglementare în domeniul Energiei i (ANRE) (C-394/21); France Télévisions SA v Playmédia and Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel (CSA) (C-298/17); Nova Kreditna Banka Maribor d.d. v Republika Slovenija (C-215/17)
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (Text with EEA relevance); Fernand Ullens de Schooten v État belge (C-268/15); José Manuel Blanco Pérez and María del Pilar Chao Gómez v Consejería de Salud y Servicios Sanitarios and Principado de Asturias (C-570/07, C-571/07); Eric Libert and Others v Gouvernement flamand (C‑197/11) and All Projects & Developments NV and Others v Vlaamse Regering (C‑203/11) (C-197/11, C-203/11); Relu Adrian Coman and Others v Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări and Ministerul Afacerilor Interne (C-673/16); Tecnoedi Costruzioni Srl v Comune di Fossano (C-318/15); Oftalma Hospital Srl v Commissione Istituti Ospitalieri Valdesi (CIOV) and Regione Piemonte (C-65/17); Eurosaneamientos SL and Others v ArcelorMittal Zaragoza SA and Francesc de Bolós Pi v Urbaser SA (C-532/15, C-538/15); Emmea Srl and Commercial Hub Srl v Comune di Siracusa and Others (C-595/16); István Bán v KP 2000 kft. and Edit Kovács (C-24/18); Criminal proceedings against Jean-Pierre Guimont (C-448/98); Massam Dzodzi v Belgian State (C-297/88, C-197/89)