Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Memoria Srl and Antonia Dall'Antonia v Comune di Padova (C-342/17)
Consideration of the question referred
Admissibility of the request for a pre…
34

Memoria Srl and Antonia Dall'Antonia v Comune di Padova (C-342/17)

Judgment of 14 Nov 2018law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-342-17/para_34@2026-11-10

34Consequently, a request for a preliminary ruling cannot be declared inadmissible simply because it was submitted at an early stage of the main proceedings.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-342/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:906
Decided: 14 Nov 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Veneto (Regional Administrative Court for the Veneto Region, Italy)
Applicants: Memoria Srl; Antonia Dall’Antonia
Defendant: Comune di Padova
Intervener: Alessandra Calore
Rapporteur: J. Malenovský
Advocate General: M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona
Bench: 5 judges
M. Vilaras, J. Malenovský, L. Bay Larsen, M. Safjan, D. Šváby
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0342

Topics

Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

14 Nov 2018Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 10: Aleš Kuhar and Jožef Kuhar v Addiko Bank d.d (C-407/18); Thelen Technopark Berlin GmbH v MN (C-261/20); X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-69/21); FA.RO. di YK & C. Sas v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli (C-16/23); 'STAR POST' ЕOOD v Komisia za regulirane na saobshteniyata (C-476/23)2 provisions; SN and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-540/22); D. M. v Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova (C-765/21)3 provisions; ZG v Beobank SA (C-351/21); ACC Silicones Ltd. v Bundeszentralamt für Steuern (C-572/20); PI v Landespolizeidirektion Tirol (C-230/18)
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Directive 2006/123/EC; Fernand Ullens de Schooten v État belge (C-268/15); Gebhart Hiebler v Walter Schlagbauer (C-293/14); José Manuel Blanco Pérez and María del Pilar Chao Gómez v Consejería de Salud y Servicios Sanitarios and Principado de Asturias (C-570/07, C-571/07); Criminal proceedings against Atanas Ognyanov (C-614/14); Hartlauer Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Wiener Landesregierung and Oberösterreichische Landesregierung (C-169/07); Alessandra Venturini v ASL Varese and Others Maria Rosa Gramegna v ASL Lodi and Others and Anna Muzzio v ASL Pavia and Others (C-159/12, C-160/12, C-161/12); European Commission v Hungary (C-179/14); Criminal proceedings against Rosanna Laezza (C-375/14); European Commission v Republic of Austria (C-387/10); Ministero per i beni e le attività culturali and Others v Ordine degli Ingegneri di Verona e Provincia and Others (C-111/12); Leopoldine Gertraud Piringer (C-342/15)