Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Feniks Sp. z o.o. v Azteca Products & Services SL (C-337/17)
Consideration of the questions referred
Substance
37

Feniks Sp. z o.o. v Azteca Products & Services SL (C-337/17)

Judgment of 4 Oct 2018law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-337-17/para_37@2026-11-10

37The special jurisdictional rules must be interpreted restrictively and cannot give rise to an interpretation going beyond the cases expressly envisaged by that regulation (judgment of 14 July 2016, Granarolo, C‑196/15, EU:C:2016:559, paragraph 18 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-337/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:805
Decided: 4 Oct 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Sąd Okręgowy w Szczecinie (Szczecin Regional Court, Poland)
Applicant: Feniks sp. z o.o.
Defendant: Azteca Products & Services SL
Rapporteur: C. Toader
Advocate General: M. Bobek
Bench: 5 judges
M. Ilešič, A. Rosas, C. Toader, A. Prechal, E. Jarašiūnas
Language: Polish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0337

Topics

Judicial cooperation in civil matters

History · 1 version

4 Oct 2018Reading

Connections

Cited by 9: Norbert Reitbauer and Others v Enrico Casamassima (C-722/17); Jana Petruchová v FIBO Group Holdings Limited (C-208/18); Wikingerhof GmbH & Co. KG v Booking.com BV (C-59/19); Skarb Pánstwa Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej – Generalny Dyrektor Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad v Stephan Riel, en qualité d’administrateur judiciaire de Alpine Bau GmbH (C-47/18); Credit Agricole Bank Polska S.A. v AB (C-183/23); HRVATSKE ŠUME d.o.o., Zagreb v BP Europa SE (C-242/20)2 provisions; TERVE Production, spol. s r.o. v Intesa Sanpaolo Holding International S.A (C-791/24); Mittelbayerischer Verlag KG v SM (C-800/19); Robert Stockdale v Council of the European Union and Others (T-776/20)
Cites 12: Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012; Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings; Granarolo SpA v Ambrosi Emmi France SA (C-196/15)2 provisions; ÖFAB, Östergötlands Fastigheter AB v Frank Koot and Evergreen Investments BV (C-147/12); "ERGO Insurance" SE v "If P&C Insurance" AS and "Gjensidige Baltic" AAS v "PZU Lietuva" UAB DK (C-359/14, C-475/14); Mario Reichert, Hans-Heinz Reichert and Ingeborg Kockler v Dresdner Bank AG (C-261/90); Jakob Handte & Co. GmbH v Traitements Mécano-chimiques des Surfaces SA (C-26/91); Peter Valach and Others v Waldviertler Sparkasse Bank AG and Others (C-649/16); flightright GmbH v Air Nostrum, Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo SA, Roland Becker v Hainan Airlines Co. Ltd and Mohamed Barkan and Others v Air Nostrum, Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo SA (C-274/16, C-447/16, C-448/16); Petra Engler v Janus Versand GmbH (C-27/02); Mario P. A. Reichert and others v Dresdner Bank (C-115/88); Christopher Seagon v Deko Marty Belgium NV (C-339/07)