Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Čepelnik d.o.o. v Michael Vavti (C-33/17)
Consideration of the questions referred
Substance
Preliminary observations
29

Čepelnik d.o.o. v Michael Vavti (C-33/17)

Judgment of 13 Nov 2018law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-33-17/para_29@2026-11-11

29In this respect, it must be observed that, under Article 1(6) of that directive, it ‘does not affect labour law’.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-33/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:896
Decided: 13 Nov 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Bezirksgericht Bleiburg/Okrajno Sodišče Pliberk (District Court, Bleiburg, Austria)
Applicant: Čepelnik d.o.o.
Defendant: Michael Vavti
Rapporteur: L. Bay Larsen
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 13 judges
K. Lenaerts, R. Silva de Lapuerta, A. Arabadjiev, M. Vilaras, E. Regan, C. Toader, A. Rosas, E. Juhász, L. Bay Larsen, M. Safjan, D. Šváby, C.G. Fernlund, C. Vajda
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0033

Topics

Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

13 Nov 2018Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 7: CJ v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) (C-389/20); Zoran Maksimovic and Others v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Murtal and Finanzpolizei (C-64/18, C-140/18, C-146/18, C-148/18)2 provisions; Amazon EU Sàrl v Ministre de la Culture and Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique (C-366/24); MT v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark (C-231/20); O.D. and Others v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) (C-350/20); CLCV and Others (Defeat device on diesel engines) (C-693/18); Criminal proceedings against Mathieu Blaise and Others (C-616/17)
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Directive 2006/123/EC; Unabhängiges Landeszentrum für Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein v Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein GmbH (C-210/16); Fédération des maisons de repos privées de Belgique (Femarbel) ASBL v Commission communautaire commune de Brussels-Capitale (C-57/12); Peter Gauweiler and Others v Deutscher Bundestag (C-62/14); Aleksei Petruhhin v Latvijas Republikas Ģenerālprokuratūra (C-182/15); Criminal proceedings against Luc Vanderborght (C-339/15); Jean-Philippe Lahorgue v Ordre des avocats du barreau de Lyon and Others (C-99/16); Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System ( ‘the IMI Regulation’ ) Text with EEA relevance; Edgard Jan De Clercq and Others (C-315/13); Čepelnik d.o.o. v Michael Vavti (C-33/17); European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (C-577/10); X NV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-498/10)