Judgment_paragraph 94 · Bashar Ibrahim and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland and Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Taus Magamadov (C-297/17, C-318/17, C-319/17, C-438/17)

94In any event, the mere fact that social protection and/or living conditions are more favourable in the Member State to which the new application for international protection has been made than in the Member State that has previously granted subsidiary protection cannot support the conclusion that the person concerned would be exposed, in the event of a transfer to the latter Member State, to a real risk of suffering treatment in breach of Article 4 of the Charter (see, by analogy, judgment of today’s date, Jawo, C‑163/17, paragraph 97).