Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Denis Raugevicius (C-247/17)
Consideration of the questions referred
31

Denis Raugevicius (C-247/17)

Judgment of 13 Nov 2018law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-247-17/para_31@2026-11-10

31Such a restriction can be justified only where it is based on objective considerations and is proportionate to the legitimate objective of the national provisions (judgment of 6 September 2016, Petruhhin, C‑182/15, EU:C:2016:630, paragraph 34 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-247/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:898
Decided: 13 Nov 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Korkein oikeus (Supreme Court, Finland)
Rapporteur: C.G. Fernlund
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 13 judges
K. Lenaerts, R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, M. Vilaras, E. Regan, F. Biltgen, C. Lycourgos, M. Ilešič, E. Levits, L. Bay Larsen, C.G. Fernlund, S. Rodin
Language: Finnish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0247

Topics

Non-discrimination Right of entry and residence

History · 1 version

13 Nov 2018Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions
Cited by 10: European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-619/18); Ruska Federacija v I.N (C-897/19 PPU); Criminal proceedings against ZW (C-454/19); WS v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-505/19); Ministère public v KN (C-219/25 PPU); Generalstaatsanwaltschaft München v S.M (C-237/21)2 provisions; Proceedings relating to the extradition of BY (C-398/19); RB v TÜV Rheinland LGA Products GmbH and Allianz IARD S.A (C-581/18); HB and IC v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) (C-168/19, C-169/19); TopFit e.V. and Daniele Biffi v Deutscher Leichtathletikverband e.V (C-22/18)2 provisions
Cites 11: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Rudy Grzelczyk v Centre public d'aide sociale d'Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve (C-184/99); Aleksei Petruhhin v Latvijas Republikas Ģenerālprokuratūra (C-182/15)2 provisions; Relu Adrian Coman and Others v Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări and Ministerul Afacerilor Interne (C-673/16); Epitropos tou Elegktikou Sinedriou sto Ipourgio Politismou kai Tourismou v Ipourgio Politismou kai Tourismou – Ipiresia Dimosionomikou Elenchou& (C-363/11); Dominic Wolzenburg (C-123/08); Elisabeta Dano and Florin Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig (C-333/13); Nils Laurin Effing (C-302/02); European Commission v Republic of Austria (C-75/11); Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi (ONEm) (C-34/09); Mario Vicente Micheletti and others v Delegación del Gobierno en Cantabria (C-369/90)