Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
X v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-213/17)
Consideration of the questions referred
The first question
26

X v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-213/17)

Judgment of 5 Jul 2018law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-213-17/para_26@2026-11-11

26In order to answer that question, it is necessary to take into account not only the wording of the provision concerned, but also its context and the general scheme of the rules of which it forms part and the objectives pursued thereby.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-213/17 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:538
Decided: 5 Jul 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Amsterdam (District Court, The Hague, sitting in Amsterdam, the Netherlands)
Applicant: X
Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
Rapporteur: L. Bay Larsen
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 5 judges
L. Bay Larsen, J. Malenovský, M. Safjan, D. Šváby, M. Vilaras
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0213

Topics

History · 1 version

5 Jul 2018Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast)
Cited by 5: AHY v Minister for Justice (C-359/22); Czech Republic v European Commission (C-742/18 P)2 provisions; Tim SpA - Direzione e coordinamento Vivendi SA v Consip SpA and Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze (C-395/18)2 provisions; M.A. and Others v The International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Others (C-661/17); Bahtiyar Fathi v Predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite (C-56/17)2 provisions
Cites 9: Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast); Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Aziz Hasan (C-360/16); Commission Regulation (EC) No 1560/2003 of 2 September 2003 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national; Daher Muse Ahmed v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-36/17); C. K. and Others v Republika Slovenija (C-578/16 PPU); Majid auch Madzhdi Shiri v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl (C-201/16); Tsegezab Mengesteab v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-670/16); Shamso Abdullahi v Bundesasylamt (C-394/12); Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast)