Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-114/17 P)
The appeal
The first ground of appeal
Findings of the Court
54

Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-114/17 P)

Judgment of 20 Sept 2018law://eu/cjeu/2017/c-114-17/para_54@2026-11-11

54As an exception to the principle of unalterability of proceedings, Article 86 must, accordingly, be interpreted strictly.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-114/17 P · ECLI:EU:C:2018:753
Decided: 20 Sept 2018
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Kingdom of Spain
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: K. Jürimäe
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 5 judges
T. von Danwitz, C. Vajda, E. Juhász, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62017CJ0114

Topics

History · 1 version

20 Sept 2018Reading

Connections

Cited by 19: Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-489/21); Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Board (T-336/20)2 provisions; AAT Byelorussian Steel Works - management company of ‘Byelorussian Metallurgical Company’ holding (BSW - management company of ‘BMC’ holding) v Council of the European Union (T-258/22); Papouis Dairies LTD and Others v European Commission (T-361/21); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-146/22); Ryanair DAC and Malta Air ltd. v European Commission (T-494/21); Ryanair DAC and Malta Air ltd. v European Commission (T-216/21); Victaulic Europe v European Commission (T-373/16); Finanziaria d'investimento Fininvest SpA (Fininvest) and Silvio Berlusconi v European Central Bank (T-913/16); Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia "Roshen" v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-254/20); Arnaldo Lucaccioni v European Commission (T-316/19); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-643/20); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-465/20); European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-704/19); Poste Italiane SpA v Riscossione Sicilia SpA agente riscossione per la provincia di Palermo e delle altre provincie siciliane and Agenzia delle entrate – Riscossione v Poste Italiane SpA (C-434/19); Qualcomm, Inc. and Qualcomm Europe, Inc. v European Commission (C-466/19 P); BP v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (C-601/19); European Commission v Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo sp. z o.o (C-56/18 P)4 provisions; Alcogroup and Alcodis v European Commission (C-403/18 P)
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions; HX v Council of the European Union (C-423/16 P); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-808/14); British Airways plc v European Commission (C-122/16 P); Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco and Others v European Commission (C-66/16 P, C-67/16 P, C-68/16 P, C-69/16 P); European Commission v World Duty Free Group SA and Others (C-20/15 P, C-21/15 P); European Commission v Hansestadt Lübeck (C-524/14 P); 2014/489/EU: Commission Decision of 19 June 2013 on State aid SA.28599 (C 23/10 (ex NN 36/10, ex CP 163/09)) implemented by the Kingdom of Spain for the deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less urbanised areas (outside Castilla-La Mancha) (notified under document C(2013) 3204) Text with EEA relevance; Comunidad Autónoma de Cataluña and Centre de Telecomunicacions i Tecnologies de la Informació de la Generalitat de Catalunya (CTTI) v European Commission (T-465/13); Abertis Telecom, SA and Retevisión I, SA v European Commission (T-541/13); Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia and Redes de Telecomunicación Galegas Retegal, SA (Retegal) v European Commission (C-70/16 P); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-81/16 P); Commission Decision (EU) 2016/1385 of 1 October 2014 on State aid SA.27408 (C 24/10 (ex NN 37/10, ex CP 19/09)) implemented by the authorities of Castilla-La Mancha for the deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less urbanised areas (notified under document C(2014) 6846) (Text with EEA relevance); Cellnex Telecom SA and Telecom Castilla-La Mancha, SA v European Commission (C-91/17); Easy Sanitary Solutions BV and European Union Intellectual Property Office v Group Nivelles (C-361/15 P, C-405/15 P); Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, and Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht (C-280/00); Commission of the European Communities v Tetra Laval BV (C-12/03 P); Stadtwerke Schwäbisch Hall GmbH, Stadtwerke Tübingen GmbH and Stadtwerke Uelzen GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-176/06)