Judgment_paragraph 31 · Mouvement pour une Europe des nations et des libertés v European Parliament (T-829/16)

31Lastly, it should be borne in mind that the present case differs from those that gave rise to the orders of 18 September 2015, Petrov and Others v Parliament and President of the Parliament (T‑452/15, not published, EU:T:2015:709), and of 4 February 2016, Voigt v Parliament (T‑618/15, not published, EU:T:2016:72), cited by the Parliament, in which the actions had been brought against the President of the Parliament and against the Parliament. In those cases, the Court merely dismissed the actions as being in part inadmissible in so far as they were brought against the President of the Parliament, and went on to conduct its examination of the substance in so far as they were also brought against the Parliament, and without examining to which party the action actually related, unlike the present case.