Judgment_paragraph 30 · David Martinez De Prins and Others v European External Action Service (T-575/16)

30In that regard, it should be noted that for any action brought by an official or retired official against the institution by which he is or was employed to be admissible, it is a necessary condition that there be an act adversely affecting him within the meaning of Article 90(2) and Article 91(1) of the Staff Regulations. According to settled case-law, only measures the legal effects of which are binding on and capable of affecting, directly and immediately, the interests of the applicant by bringing about a distinct change in his legal position are acts which may be the subject of an action for annulment preceded, as required by Article 91 of the Staff Regulations, by a complaint (judgments of 14 February 1989, Bossi v Commission, 346/87, EU:C:1989:59, paragraph 23; of 18 September 2008, Angé Serrano and Others v European Parliament, T‑47/05, EU:T:2008:384, paragraph 61, and of 16 July 2015, EJ and Others v Commission, F‑112/14, EU:F:2015:90, paragraph 40).

David Martinez De Prins and Others v European External Action Service (T-575/16)

History · 1 version

Key facts

Connections