Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
TestBioTech eV v European Commission (T-33/16)
Law
The extent of internal review under Ar…
42

TestBioTech eV v European Commission (T-33/16)

Judgment of 14 Mar 2018law://eu/cjeu/2016/t-33-16/para_42@2026-11-11

42In that regard, first, it is clear that Article 2(1)(f) of Regulation No 1367/2006 states that the question whether an act was adopted under environmental law does not depend on the legal basis on which the legal provision at issue was adopted.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Seventh Chamber
Case: T-33/16 · ECLI:EU:T:2018:135
Decided: 14 Mar 2018
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: TestBioTech eV
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: V. Tomljenović
Bench: 3 judges
V. Tomljenović, E. Bieliūnas, A. Kornezov
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016TJ0033

Topics

History · 1 version

14 Mar 2018Reading

Connections

Cited by 7: Global Legal Action Network and Climate Action Network Europe (CAN-Europe) v European Commission (T-120/24); Aurelia Stiftung v European Commission (T-565/23)2 provisions; ClientEarth and Collectif Nourrir v European Commission (T-399/23); ClientEarth AISBL v Council of the European Union (T-577/22); Associazione "Terra Mia Amici No Tap" v European Investment Bank (T-86/22); Stichting Comité N 65 Ondergronds Helvoirt v European Commission (T-569/20); ClientEarth v European Investment Bank (T-9/19)
Cites 9: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)16 provisions; Gowan Comércio Internacional e Serviços Lda v Ministero della Salute (C-77/09); European Commission v Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) (C-673/13 P); 2005/370/EC: Council Decision of 17 February 2005 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters; Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies; Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety; Council of the European Union and Others v Vereniging Milieudefensie and Stichting Stop Luchtverontreiniging Utrecht (C-401/12 P, C-402/12 P, C-403/12 P); Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC - Commission Declaration; Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed (Text with EEA relevance)