Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Congregación de Escuelas Pías Provincia Betania v Ayuntamiento de Getafe (C-74/16)
Judgment
Consideration of the question referred
Substance
The concepts of undertaking and econom…
42

Congregación de Escuelas Pías Provincia Betania v Ayuntamiento de Getafe (C-74/16)

Judgment of 27 Jun 2017law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-74-16/para_42@2026-11-10

42It follows that the public or private status of the entity engaged in the activity in question has no bearing on the question as to whether or not that entity is an ‘undertaking’.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-74/16 · ECLI:EU:C:2017:496
Decided: 27 Jun 2017
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 4 de Madrid (Administrative Court No 4, Madrid, Spain)
Applicant: Congregación de Escuelas Pías Provincia Betania
Defendant: Ayuntamiento de Getafe
Rapporteur: A. Arabadjiev
Advocate General: Kokott
Bench: 15 judges
K. Lenaerts, A. Tizzano, M. Ilešič, L. Bay Larsen, T. von Danwitz, E. Juhász, M. Berger, A. Prechal, M. Vilaras, E. Regan, A. Rosas, A. Arabadjiev, M. Safjan, D. Šváby, E. Jarašiūnas
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0074

Topics

History · 1 version

27 Jun 2017Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)
Cited by 23: Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen (NMBS) v Mbutuku Kanyeba and Others (C-349/18, C-350/18, C-351/18); European Commission v Hungary (C-769/22); Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab Afdeling Schackenborgvænge and Others v MV and Others (C-417/23); Staten genom Sjöfartsverket v Stockholms Hamn AB (C-401/24)2 provisions; E. sp. z o.o. v Prezydent Miasta Mielca (C-453/23); Kingdom of Denmark v European Commission (T-364/20); Autorità di sistema portuale del Mar Ligure occidentale and Others v European Commission (T-166/21); TS and HI v Ministar na zemedelieto, hranite i gorite (C-325/22); Região Autónoma da Madeira v European Commission (T-131/21); Azienda Nazionale Autonoma Strade SpA (ANAS) v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (C-545/21); Casa Regina Apostolorum della Pia Società delle Figlie di San Paolo v European Commission (C-492/21); A v Åklagarmyndigheten (C-666/21); Freikirche der Siebenten-Tags-Adventisten in Deutschland KdöR v Bildungsdirektion für Vorarlberg (C-372/21); Sogia Ellas AE v European Commission (T-347/20); Portuguese Republic v European Commission (T-95/21); Fondul Proprietatea SA v Guvernul României and Others (C-179/20); Eco Fox Srl and Others v Fallimento Mythen Spa and Others (C-915/19)2 provisions; Casa Regina Apostolorum della Pia Società delle Figlie di San Paolo v European Commission (T-223/18); European Commission and Slovak Republic v Dôvera zdravotná poistʼovňa, a.s (C-262/18 P, C-271/18 P); TK and Others v Land Sachsen-Anhalt (C-773/18, C-774/18, C-775/18); Arriva Italia Srl and Others v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (C-385/18); Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A. v European Commission (T-778/17); Port autonome du Centre et de l'Ouest SCRL and Others v European Commission (T-673/17)
Cites 23: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Eric Libert and Others v Gouvernement flamand (C‑197/11) and All Projects & Developments NV and Others v Vlaamse Regering (C‑203/11) (C-197/11, C-203/11); Motosykletistiki Omospondia Ellados NPID (MOTOE) v Elliniko Dimosio (C-49/07); Mediaset SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo economico (C-69/13); Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) and European Commission vAlouminion tis Ellados VEAE (C-590/14 P); P Oy (C-6/12); Deutsche Lufthansa AG v Flughafen Frankfurt-Hahn GmbH (C-284/12); Commission Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006 of 15 December 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to de minimis aid; European Commission v World Duty Free Group SA and Others (C-20/15 P, C-21/15 P); European Commission v Versalis SpA and Eni SpA and Versalis SpA and Eni SpA v European Commission (C-93/13 P, C-123/13 P); European Commission v Hansestadt Lübeck (C-524/14 P); Aéroports de Paris v Commission of the European Communities (C-82/01 P); Enirisorse SpA v Sotacarbo SpA (C-237/04); Association Vent De Colère! Fédération nationale and Others v Ministre de l’Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement and Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie (C-262/12); Bouygues SA and Others v European Commission and Others (C-399/10 P, C-401/10 P); Herbert Schwarz and Marga Gootjes-Schwarz v Finanzamt Bergisch Gladbach (C-76/05); Direktor na Agentsia "Mitnitsi" v Biovet AD (C-306/14); Orange v European Commission (C-211/15 P); Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (C-318/05); Ministerio de Defensa and Navantia SA v Concello de Ferrol (C-522/13); Paul Vervloet and Others v Ministerraad (C-76/15); Udo Steymann v Staatssecretaris van Justitie (C-196/87); Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze v Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA, Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di San Miniato and Cassa di Risparmio di San Miniato SpA (C-222/04)