Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Proceedings brought by A (C-679/16)
Consideration of the questions referred
The first question
33

Proceedings brought by A (C-679/16)

Judgment of 25 Jul 2018law://eu/cjeu/2016/c-679-16/para_33@2026-11-10

33Given that the two conditions mentioned in the preceding paragraph are cumulative, the fact that one of them is not satisfied will mean that the benefit in question does not fall within the scope of Regulation No 883/2004.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-679/16 · ECLI:EU:C:2018:601
Decided: 25 Jul 2018
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Supreme Administrative Court, Finland)
Rapporteur: M. Berger
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 5 judges
J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, E. Levits, A. Borg Barthet, M. Berger, F. Biltgen
Language: Finnish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62016CJ0679

Topics

Social security

History · 1 version

25 Jul 2018Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (Text with relevance for the EEA and for Switzerland)
Cited by 11: WA v Direcţia pentru Evidenţa Persoanelor şi Administrarea Bazelor de Date din Ministerul Afacerilor Interne (C-491/21); Criminal proceedings against ZW (C-454/19); European Commission v Hungary (C-769/22); I. J. v VĮ Registrų centras (C-789/23); PE, légalement représentée par ses parents v Städteregion Aachen (C-257/24); E.P. v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak (C-277/23); XXXX v Sozialministeriumservice (C-116/23); A v Latvijas Republikas Veselības ministrija (C-535/19); Caisse d’assurance retraite et de la santé au travail d’Alsace-Moselle v SJ and Ministre chargé de la Sécurité sociale (C-769/18)2 provisions; UB v Generálny riaditeľ Sociálnej poisťovne Bratislava (C-447/18)2 provisions; Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics v Mr and Mrs Raymond Dreyer (C-372/18)2 provisions
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (Text with relevance for the EEA and for Switzerland); Caisse nationale des prestations familiales v Fjola Hliddal (C‑216/12) and Pierre-Louis Bornand (C‑217/12) (C-216/12, C-217/12); Siegfried Otte v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-25/95); Silvia Hosse v Land Salzburg (C-286/03); Nabiel Peter Bogendorff von Wolffersdorff v Standesamt der Stadt Karlsruhe and Zentraler Juristischer Dienst der Stadt Karlsruhe (C-438/14); HK Danmark, acting on behalf of Jette Ring v Dansk almennyttigt Boligselskab (C‑335/11) and HK Danmark, acting on behalf of Lone Skouboe Werge v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening, acting on behalf of Pro Display A/S (C‑337/11) (C-335/11, C-337/11); Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Tolley (deceased, acting in the proceedings by her personal representative) (C-430/15); B. Martens v Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap (C-359/13); Manfred Molenaar and Barbara Fath-Molenaar v Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse Baden-Württemberg (C-160/96); Silke Gaumain-Cerri v Kaufmännische Krankenkasse - Pflegekasse and Maria Barth v Landesversicherungsanstalt Rheinprovinz (C-502/01, C-31/02); Vera Hoeckx v Openbaar Centrum voor Maatschappelijk Welzijn, Kalmthout (C-249/83); European Commission v Slovak Republic (C-433/13); Kerly Del Rosario Martinez Silva v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) and Comune di Genova (C-449/16); Rose Hughes v Chief Adjudication Officer, Belfast (C-78/91); Lucy Stewart v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (C-503/09); Joao Filipe da Silva Martins v Bank Betriebskrankenkasse - Pflegekasse (C-388/09); Stefan Czerwiński v Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Gdańsku (C-517/16); European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (C-562/10); Friedrich Jauch v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Arbeiter (C-215/99); Proceedings brought by A (C-679/16)